Forum Discussion
Player_srr5r59i
2 years agoSeasoned Veteran
"Babykittyjade;c-18274023" wrote:"Horrorgirl6;c-18273989" wrote:"Esia;c-18273981" wrote:"Horrorgirl6;c-18273974" wrote:
I like that the world is ranch world.America is very huge country we different climate, regions, and cultures.Were not all like California or New York
Seeing another climate is nice.
America is diverse and all, sure, but the rest of the world is way more diverse and way less represented in the Sims. I'm disappointed by them choosing yet another US place while all of freaking ASIA has just one world.
Listen I am all for representation for other countries.I just think its okay for them to do both.As long as the new worlds are different unique I have no issue them picking American worlds.
Also keep in mind representing a different country respectfully is harder than it looks.They have to be respectful to the culture.You also have picked a theme that fits.
agree 100%. It's not as simple as just go make a foreign world because everybody is looking for something to pick apart no matter how much research they put into it.
the anti American world thing that's all the rage on social media is weird. There is nothing wrong with American devs making American worlds in an American game. It's kind of insulting actually to shame them for it. The U.S is their home and culture and there are many beautiful locations in the U.S. Although I'm sure their are devs from non American places as well. (Like the wonderful simgurusalo?)
It just doesn't seem right.
That's like being mad at Japanese game makers for making Japanese games with Japanese settings and characters.
I understand the desire people have for more exotic locations that you usually only find in places outside the U.S because I also like to see a wide variety of places but people are just too culturally sensitive. And every little thing is seen as disrespectful or offensive. I love a pack that has a good balance of positive, and negative mischief things to do.
We could not do a single mischief thing in snowy escape (taking selfies at graves was removed)
for evil sims because no one could tolerate it.
In Sulani cleaning trash is considered fun game play. But hey, no one could get offended by that right? ? I'd sacrifice an exotic world for more risky adventurous game play. It's a GAME afterall.
I do believe we will still get worlds based on non U.S countries because the sims 4 content is not finished yet. But I also think people take the sims worlds too literal. They want so bad to tie them in with real life places when it's all fictional and very loosely based on real places because the devs need a reference to create from.
I don't believe it was ever meant to be taken as 100% literally a specific location.
I'm still hoping to get a totally outside of this earth fantasy world at some point.
Full agree. I've never understood the complaint and find it puerile and unrealistic. On principle, I'm not against exotic locations being added, but folks really need to touch grass and realize this game has little to do with real life.