Quarterly Teasers: Statement from SimGuruKate

"luthienrising;c-16949297" wrote:

"keekee53;c-16948950" wrote:

"Archieonic;c-16948387" wrote:
More PR talk that shows nothing but a total disconnect with the community. Hell, I've played many games where developers constantly say what their plans are, what they are working on, even show some pictures of raw design. But nope, none of that here. Because things can change? Sure, the first and only development team that may completely change what pack they are working on at any minute...

What pack are you working on? Nope.
Is X feature in the plans? Nope
What about X bug? Nope
Will you revamp X? Nope
Do you thin- Nope
Nope.

Great communication skills!

Yep because I still believe they can announce the pack without the when and be safe from the SEC rule. I feel like the SEC rule is just being used as an excuse not to share information. EA is the one who does not want them to share, that is my opinion on it.

SEC stuff has not been given as a reason for not announcing packs earlier. That has only ever been about patched content. I would think that not announcing packs earlier means that they don't have to deal with managing the community every time they have to change or drop content that's already been discussed, and they don't have to deal with answering an added influx of community questions.

I'm curious about these games that are apparently discussing development all the time - I don't play a lot of games, but my family does and I've not heard them mention very many that do this to any degree at all. What are they? What are their communities like in terms of how they discuss things with the house? How big is the house? Are these games in open betas?

I have no doubt about that..LOL It would be madness on twitter with the questions. It is the reason I think it is their own decision and not some regulation behind it.

These long dry spells just cause the community to get bananas with theories anyway. Now that they have added consoles to the mix, I am sure it is taking them twice as long to get content out. I feel like teasers could be a thing even if it is not a quarterly one. How about calling it the up and coming teaser or whatever. A time frame doesn't have to be associated with a sneak peek.