"SimTrippy;c-16359555" wrote:
"JoAnne65;c-16359526" wrote:
Can we please treat this hovering above the versions? Indeed, Sims 3 had the problem too. So, back to the problem.
You know what's weird though? That you guys (ETA: "you guys" sounds more pejorative than it's supposed to, I just don't know how else to phrase it right now) compare sims 3 and 4 all the time, but when people do it to somewhat reasonably interject that this approach to content isn't new, suddenly the comparison is off limits? Weird isn't it. Especially because in an objective discussion on the topic of recycled content and how people feel about it, it seems like a pretty fair point to make..
Also @DeservedCriticism if you want this to be an open discussion, maybe try not sounding so aggressive when someone dares to point out what they think could be positive about this. Because, dude, it's not an unimportant discussion, but I feel you only want people here who see things your way? Maybe I'm wrong. Okay, now I'm out, sorry ^^
Actually I hate comparison topics and comparisons constantly being dragged in but ok, for argument’s sake I’ll play along and pretend I’m one of ‘you guys’: compare all you like when comparing is the subject. The thing is, it’s not here. Recycling content is the subject and to what extent that’s defendable and acceptable. And at what point it becomes cheap, damaging and unacceptable.
“And let's not forget it's always been that way, when it comes to bugs, modders saved TS3 as well” is not constructive to this discussion. What does that even mean? ‘They also messed up in the past so please let them continue with that, we’ve grown accustomed to it?’
