"SimTrippy;c-16359555" wrote:
"JoAnne65;c-16359526" wrote:
Can we please treat this hovering above the versions? Indeed, Sims 3 had the problem too. So, back to the problem.
You know what's weird though? That you guys (ETA: "you guys" sounds more pejorative than it's supposed to, I just don't know how else to phrase it right now) compare sims 3 and 4 all the time, but when people do it to somewhat reasonably interject that this approach to content isn't new, suddenly the comparison is off limits? Weird isn't it. Especially because in an objective discussion on the topic of recycled content and how people feel about it, it seems like a pretty fair point to make..
Also @DeservedCriticism if you want this to be an open discussion, maybe try not sounding so aggressive when someone dares to point out what they think could be positive about this. Because, dude, it's not an unimportant discussion, but I feel you only want people here who see things your way? Maybe I'm wrong. Okay, now I'm out, sorry ^^
The issue for me is it makes it seem like that excuses the issue.
I don't think we should say well "Timmy also tripped Joe" when looking at when John tripped Joe, we should say "Tripping others is a problem John don't do that." (weird example but it is what came to mind)
Recycling stuff with bugs is a problem. How does comparing to the sims 3/2/1 change that issue?
Also as stated in the op recycling isn't necessarily bad, it's only bad when it is
a) detracting from potential new content
or
b) is recycling something broken/flawed
Correct me if I'm wrong @DeservedCriticism but I've seen a lot of posts responding about recycling in general as bad not the specific examples I think you are intending to look at.
