For me the point of this topic (and issue) lies in this paragraph:
My personal stance on recycling content goes like this: if a pack manages to deliver quality content, then recycling existing content can be warranted if smaller features are recycled. If someone pointed out content that Vampires recycled for example, I would hesitate to pass judgement because Vampires was a solid pack. I have no way of knowing why they chose to recycle it, but I believe in good faith and benefit of the doubt, so if the pack is solid and there's recycled content, I'll assume they needed to recycle content so they could focus on putting more effort elsewhere.
And the fact they apparently recycled something that doesn’t function right (I have no experience with those careers though, so I take a step back as to if that’s actually the case here). The ivy is a bit easy from a developer’s perspective (at least change
something about it, if only the colour), but as far as I’m concerned not a disaster to be honest. I agree with @Cynna concerning the tomb raiding.
