Forum Discussion
7 years ago
"invisiblgirl;c-16899420" wrote:"Stormsview;c-16899319" wrote:
It's not against the law, It's just that these retailers like to stick together. So they all have this ESRB Rating, and they treat them like they are the law.
This the reason I feel they need two versions. Sells will go up not down. With one Version sales will most likely go down a lot.
That would require development time, and personally, I'd rather they spend their time on other things. Let modders add the more 'adult' stuff. (Though personally, I suspect that 'adult' features - both violence and woo-hoo - tend to appeal more to the teens who are forbidden to buy it.)
You make a good point about the ESRB and retailers - you lose a lot of sales if you can't sell at the major stores. And while some of the ESRB components don't make sense (it's rather silly to pixel out a fully-dressed toddler on the pot), the developers don't make those rules.
I agree with you about developers time. but as far as Toddlers go, with the type of people in the world, Yes they need to be covered. Do we cover our toddlers in their little pools in our real sure we do? Do you want your toddlers on web uncovered, no way? EA is right in covering toddlers, I am sure they are protective of their own toddlers. I know I am.
Adults are fully dressed as well and we to are blocked out. Its a form of respect. And this respect is also passed on to the toddlers and kids as well as teens
If you take your toddlers out uncovered, you will not have them for long. They would be taken away if the parent does not understand that they need to be covered.
About The Sims 4 General Discussion
Join lively discussions, share tips, and exchange experiences on Sims 4 Expansion Packs, Game Packs, Stuff Packs & Kits.33,857 PostsLatest Activity: 6 minutes ago
Community Highlights
Recent Discussions
- 6 minutes ago
- 7 minutes ago
- 25 minutes ago