Forum Discussion
3 years ago
"Stormkeep;c-18054962" wrote:
You're misunderstanding what I'm saying. I'm saying that in both cases it is the individuals and their nature which create the dysfunctionality, not the concept of the marriage in the first place.
Your reasons for being against polygamy is as much about creating a dysfunctional relationship as the people whom you indicate twist a monogamous marriage and make it dysfunctional. I'm in no way saying you are twisted for being that way. Twisting was your word, not mine.
I just happen to think people are people, and we're all different. Hence why some things work for some and not for others.
How is being in a mutualy consenting monogamous relationship where neither side believes that they own or are owned by another dysfunctional? If a polygamous relationship is fully consenting and everyone is happy then good for them. I never said otherwise. What I did say is that there is more of a chance of it becoming a dysfunctional jealous heap of chaos when more people are involved.
I also never said that no one should be allowed to do it.