Spark'd Challenge: Destination Weddings!

Im soooo exited for those challenges!

https://twitter.com/TheSims/status/1284142824406093824?s=20

I've checked the judging criteria. I don't feel that it's going to be fair to the smaller creators. Only those with a lot of likes by the community will later on be judged by the EA employees in the second round. Unless, all the creations are submitted under anonymous. I personally feel that, it will have a lot of issues later on.

Hmmm. Weddings, huh? Not my normal forte but then... who said weddings have to be "normal" anyway? B)

If someone chose the trait lot of Clothing Optional, I'm gonna bust up laughing! ?

"xamira99;c-17577933" wrote:
I've checked the judging criteria. I don't feel that it's going to be fair to the smaller creators. Only those with a lot of likes by the community will later on be judged by the EA employees in the second round. Unless, all the creations are submitted under anonymous. I personally feel that, it will have a lot of issues later on.

Fully agree. I submitted today and can already feel the point in it slipping away ? the challenge page is already flooded with houses having nothing to do with the challenge but getting super high downloads and faves while tonnes of gorgeous wedding venues are only getting one or two, or overlooked completely ??‍♀️ Definitely needed a better curation process!

My biggest thought is. . . Can the storytelling entries be more cinematic with subtitles instead of voice overs (English of course), or do they have to be in full on live mode with straight overview?

"Sunnukii;c-17578476" wrote:
My biggest thought is. . . Can the storytelling entries be more cinematic with subtitles instead of voice overs (English of course), or do they have to be in full on live mode with straight overview?

@Sunnukii

https://twitter.com/Cassie_Paulin/status/1284224261280927744?s=20

https://twitter.com/HolliebbTV/status/1284225470704218118?s=20

"Jen411371__;c-17578382" wrote:

"xamira99;c-17577933" wrote:
I've checked the judging criteria. I don't feel that it's going to be fair to the smaller creators. Only those with a lot of likes by the community will later on be judged by the EA employees in the second round. Unless, all the creations are submitted under anonymous. I personally feel that, it will have a lot of issues later on.

Fully agree. I submitted today and can already feel the point in it slipping away ? the challenge page is already flooded with houses having nothing to do with the challenge but getting super high downloads and faves while tonnes of gorgeous wedding venues are only getting one or two, or overlooked completely ??‍♀️ Definitely needed a better curation process!

Yeah, I noticed that too..There's no way they can control the submission unless they're going to check it one by one, or best, if all submission is anonymous so no one can influence anyone to vote, unless, they are being sneaky. Though it does make sense to select top 100 based on favourites or downloaded, but there's no way they can make it fair when there's a few community members are being dishonest. I sincerely want EA acknowledged hidden talents, because I know, there're a lot of them out there. Let's just say, I want to see new faces... :D ;)

"Jen411371__;c-17578382" wrote:

"xamira99;c-17577933" wrote:
I've checked the judging criteria. I don't feel that it's going to be fair to the smaller creators. Only those with a lot of likes by the community will later on be judged by the EA employees in the second round. Unless, all the creations are submitted under anonymous. I personally feel that, it will have a lot of issues later on.

Fully agree. I submitted today and can already feel the point in it slipping away ? the challenge page is already flooded with houses having nothing to do with the challenge but getting super high downloads and faves while tonnes of gorgeous wedding venues are only getting one or two, or overlooked completely ??‍♀️ Definitely needed a better curation process!

People are just being used in a big marketing scheme.