"Loanet;c-16750047" wrote:
The last thing EA - or anybody - would want would be for Sims 4 and Sims 5 to be in competition with each other.
EA has mentioned a new Sims game, but said nothing about Sims 5. Remember we have Sims Freeplay, Sims Mobile, and Sims Console. I predict another spinoff. Sims 4 is flexible for content but there's always new mediums coming out to take advantage of.
Sims Oculus, anybody?
This would either make a good Sims 5 (after all, V is the roman numeral for 5, and VR...contains V.) or a good spinoff. Virtual reality Sims would indeed likely require a redo of the game engine. EA also has not released many VR compatible titles to date, to say the least, so if Sims VR is Sims 5, they would *need* to push Sims 4 so that it lasts at least until close to the time that Sims 5 is ready. Sims VR could also be a good spinoff, and in the current state of VR gaming, most VR games tend to be pretty primitive so far. The technology simply hasn't advanced enough to make a good Sims game yet. Most people would also need to have computers capable of running VR before they would release it as any more than a spinoff. Right now, the minimum specs for running VR games exceed most computers' specs. My computer is capable of running VR, but I don't use it for that because VR headsets are still too high priced. I think if there finally becomes a universal standard for VR, that runs on mobile, as well as PC, Mac, and console, more people will invest in VR. Also, if the price of VR gaming equipment goes down below $150, we will see a lot more people purchase them. The current pricing makes them basically expensive toys for the rich or semi-rich. (Yes, if you have an annual income above $100K US, you are semi-rich in my view, and if your annual income is above $500K US, I consider you rich.) That, or perhaps you live with somebody else, where that somebody else pays most of your expenses, and you buy gaming toys. Or, you bought the gaming toys instead of health insurance or a gym membership.