Forum Discussion
luthienrising
9 years agoHero+
"husseinandali;c-15813039" wrote:"luthienrising;c-15811125" wrote:
People were flipping out over $20 for "just" Vampires, until the pack came out... and was widely praised for being a deep handling of Vampires. Maybe having just two animal species in a Pets pack would mean we'd end up with better just-two-animals the way the Vampires pack worked. I'd be happy with $40 cats and dogs if they finally made it fun for me to play the way, finally, I find to be the case for vampires and toddlers (which didn't get squashed into the basegame in a lame way, like babies were). Quality over quantity. For me, personally, ten (or whatever) half-done animals for $40 would be more of a rip-off than two really well done, engaging animals for $40.
I remember in Sims 3 days we used to receive quality and quantity all together
If the pack is only cats and dogs I'm not interested
That first statement is a matter of opinion, and you'll see plenty of varying opinion on it. I personally always felt that Supernatural, Generations, Pets, Late Night, and Ambitions delivered more quantity than quality. They were all packs that I ended up finding shallow in actual gameplay. I definitely got my money's worth in quality from Sims 3 Seasons, though. I feel like the Sims teams have found a better quality groove lately, even if it's been at the cost of some quantity.