"Oldeseadogge;c-17428539" wrote:
"catitude5;c-17423525" wrote:
"Beardedgeek;c-17422865" wrote:
I usually never go bigger than 30x20; I have never had the need for a bigger lot; besides the idea of my Sim taking 3 hours to go to the kitchen from the bedroom is a bit hilarious.
Tiny living is great; I doubt I will live in a house bigger than 100 squares much anymore.
I can't take screenshots in houses that small. Everything is too crowded. Just because you have a large lot doesn't mean you have to make a super large house. But with a too small lot, you're stuck with it.
I hear you! I have some sims (evicted the prior occupants) in the largest house in Glimmerbrook and taking screenshots is an utter bear. The place is way too cramped. Hate to think of what those PC tiny houses would be like for that. I build my houses to meet the needs of the occupants, generally basing them on RL prototypes.
The thing is... the need differs.
As I said above I wouldn't know what to do with more than four rooms IRL.
And screenshots? I take them just fine. Of course i am not trying to be artistic, I am just wanting to remember story progress.
(Btw, the Glimmerbrook style houses, just like the Victorian houses in general, do have very small rooms IRL too, since heating was expensive and you probably only heated the rooms you intended to use that day. Which is why a medium sized Victorian house probably had two or more small sitting rooms, not one big livingroom, for example).