Haven’t been here in awhile, so essay ahoy:
- Newspapers and babies have always been lame.
- MFP and Moschino may be bad, but they’re in no way objectively
even worse than Sweet Treats.
- If Sweet Treats had to exist it should’ve been a Store set you could cherrypick through. The Jessica Rabbit dress alone made so much bank!!
- Having no CASt is far better than having laggy badly coded CASt. That said not having a basic color wheel implemented in The Year Our Llama 2019 is inexcusable.
- I would love to have imaginary friends and Plumbots back. Only if they have the GP skill trees and are CAS customizable though.
"SelinaKyles;c-17236947" wrote:
LGR reviews are overly praised.
I freaking love having pets and supernaturals ingame but I completely understand why Clint doesn’t. But his stuff has such great production value so I always look forward to watching the reviews simply for that. That said it’s pretty hypocritical how so many people rely on him to make their own opinion
for them . . . yet accuse TS4 fans of being the real ? (and I say this as someone whose main game is TS3). Use your brain and make one yourselves you wannabe contrarians!
That said the Ralph joke always comes off as him cutting off his nose to spite his own face. If you think TS4 stuff packs have little to no value for the money you would spend for them? Great! I’m glad you did the math and saved some cash! But don’t act like setting a doll on fire — something you can only do finitely before you
have to purchase another finite doll — is equivalent as paying once for a digital product you can use limitlessly and infinitely.
(edited because of weird word filtering)