Forum Discussion
babajayne
6 years agoSeasoned Ace
@Karon - Something with the quote coding got messed up and where it looks like you’re quoting me, your response to me seems to look like something I said. I don’t know if that’s an easy fix on your end, but I did want to point it out.
I don’t think ranked voting would give the impression that we’re getting more than one SP. The way I understand rank voting is more like this scenario for each voter:
#1 has a weight of 4 votes
#2 has a weight of 3 votes
#3 has a weight of 2 votes
#4 has a weight of 1 vote
#5 has a weight of no votes
This way it’s possible for something to win that more people would buy even if it’s their second choice rather than a bunch of people not buying the SP because no one knew that’s what they were least interested in. I think it would increase sales and still make people happy even if if ended up not being the first choice of the majority.
I don’t think ranked voting would give the impression that we’re getting more than one SP. The way I understand rank voting is more like this scenario for each voter:
#1 has a weight of 4 votes
#2 has a weight of 3 votes
#3 has a weight of 2 votes
#4 has a weight of 1 vote
#5 has a weight of no votes
This way it’s possible for something to win that more people would buy even if it’s their second choice rather than a bunch of people not buying the SP because no one knew that’s what they were least interested in. I think it would increase sales and still make people happy even if if ended up not being the first choice of the majority.