Changed tuning IDs breaks custom content
@SimGuruModSquad I'd just like to bring to your attention the huge problem some of these patches bring to custom content - and I am not just talking about mods which we already accept can be broken by...
Forum Discussion
"stanfordmd09;15042545" wrote:
@_orangemittens_ What are those who have macs to do? I do not have parallels or bootcamp or whatever it is called to installed the program to get the batch. I also have hundreds of lights and it would be too tedious and painstaking to find every single light and redownload them. I feel like us mac users as just being left aside and its not fair (not at all saying this is your fault)
"_orangemittens_;15045824" wrote:
@stanfordmd09, a Mac version of Studio is underway and our hope is that Mac users won't have much longer to wait. The Mac version will, of course, include all the batch fixers that the Windows version has.
"egwarhammer;15047573" wrote:"_orangemittens_;15045824" wrote:
@stanfordmd09, a Mac version of Studio is underway and our hope is that Mac users won't have much longer to wait. The Mac version will, of course, include all the batch fixers that the Windows version has.
I don't have a Mac, and don't know any more about them than to offer people the Mac forum link for issues... but I am STILL tickled to see this in print!
Thanks for sharing! :)
I agree that it's delightful to see the creators of unofficial add-ons and utilities taking ownership of the state of their own work. The SimGurus have done an exemplary job supporting personal projects and it certainly isn't possible to expand any version of the sims without extension and conversion of data, especially tuning. It would be absurd to accuse the devs of failure for following standard practices or to expect special communication regarding asset management.
