Funds

Take out rt crates make cnc great again. stop the pay to win but it really wont change much people can't farm correctly anyway.

maybey if they put a limit on fortess hits to 1st 2nd and 3rd people would move on and spend more money on new servers close servers after 3rd takedown

Gamerdruid is the most active moderator in this thread, yet the most clueless. Just reading his replies makes me cringe. Do you troll us or are you honestly that clueless about this game?

In a competitive environment that this game provides, you want to use every advantage there is. That means use Supply Points for TA.
So let's say right now in Firestorm 14 I have 1800 Supply Points. I would want to buy command points for them to maximize my account's growth. That's 1800/10 = 180 times I would buy command points.
The TA cost for buying command points is 247. SO 180 x 247 = 44460. There literally 40 bucks spent already.

I am getting 280/d growth rate of supply points so it will take me 6.4 days to recharge. Woah! Another 50k of TA for 40 bucks spent. Do you realize how insane that is?

Nobody can or should be paying this much.

Just to compare to other much better games, like world of warcraft, you spend 11 bucks for monthly subscription and you get constant game updates, lots of new content every year.

EA must be insane to justify these prices.

"VargurMoshic;c-2144611" wrote:

The "top" players aren't all that matters. It further exacerbates the difference in power between what you consider "top" players and the majority of players.
And it didn't work for me, regardless, no matter what I did.

maybe not all but most what matters.
i mean the top200 accs of a world, make the world. i lets say 99% of those have funded cheap. i played with like 150-250 players on my last worlds on i cant say who didnt used it.

sorry for you that it didnt worked, what you did? you just needed to change your country to ARG and thats it, no VPN no other tricks.

"Grimraven85;c-2144618" wrote:

Just to compare to other much better games, like world of warcraft, you spend 11 bucks for monthly subscription and you get constant game updates, lots of new content every year.

EA must be insane to justify these prices.

thats the point for me, even the 13$ for ARG funds lately is much. you consume this so fast.
maybe the idea of having more CP and rep time each day but with a fixed fee can help (like an abo). but i dont know.

for me the argument you have (and not only for me), that you get much more for your money in other games (with real graphics), is the most important agrument.

Its just sad that the community is lost then as well but lets say it, i couldnt find a game yet which is similar to cnc ta.

> @reinemachfrau said:
> (Quote)

> for me the argument you have (and not only for me), that you get much more for your money in other games (with real graphics), is the most important agrument.
>
> Its just sad that the community is lost then as well but lets say it, i couldnt find a game yet which is similar to cnc ta.

Exactly! Now, I understand that world of warcraft community is much larger, so maybe that's why they can afford to charge their players only 11 dollars a month, but if EA thinks they can get their small community of 600-1000 players to pay ~$300 a month, they are out of touch with reality.

> @Grimraven85 said:
> > @reinemachfrau said:
> > (Quote)
>
> > for me the argument you have (and not only for me), that you get much more for your money in other games (with real graphics), is the most important agrument.
> >
> > Its just sad that the community is lost then as well but lets say it, i couldnt find a game yet which is similar to cnc ta.
>
> Exactly! Now, I understand that world of warcraft community is much larger, so maybe that's why they can afford to charge their players only 11 dollars a month, but if EA thinks they can get their small community of 600-1000 players to pay ~$300 a month, they are out of touch with reality.

SO TRUE!!!!!!!!

why do i even bother.

post deleted.

"reinemachfrau;c-2144622" wrote:
you get much more for your money in other games (with real graphics), is the most important agrument.

just go there and use your facebook to announce your great "whatever".
damn whiner... do u even know how to properly play this game?

as things are atm., one with no funds can go a long way... only thing required is "know how" and be active.
i agree that it can get real expensive for the top (the rank 1 mostly) alliances... that is their choice and complaining about it just doesn't feel right.

"jbl3ck;c-2144912" wrote:

"reinemachfrau;c-2144622" wrote:
you get much more for your money in other games (with real graphics), is the most important agrument.

just go there and use your facebook to announce your great "whatever".
damn whiner... do u even know how to properly play this game?

as things are atm., one with no funds can go a long way... only thing required is "know how" and be active.
i agree that it can get real expensive for the top (the rank 1 mostly) alliances... that is their choice and complaining about it just doesn't feel right.

too bad i dont have FB account.

dude you ever played this game without funds? you cant kill bases with 100cp, i mean bases which are needed and not just the easy ones - but ok.
or you play a world for years? which is an acceptable play style, but just not for the top teams.

I dont whine btw, i just show what most people i play with think about actual situion.

just a hint for our smart ass: without a paying player base (funds free, like you think its a good solution), you also cant play the game (i hope you understand why) ;-) - but sure its easier to mock the correct claims in this thread, instead of facing the reality.