Forum Discussion
7 years ago
"gamerdruid;c-2053415" wrote:
I'd be surprised if more than 500 spent the money you're suggesting. Most servers, including the WCS's have a lot of accounts that don't fund. Yes, most of the top players are funding heavily but even 500 is probably an over estimate. Quickly it will settle down to 2 or maybe 3 alliances of funding players until the winner is obvious, then it may be only 1. (Or if the winner is being challenged, then there may be more).
On the criteria for getting onto the WCS I'd go further than one badge now. I'd say a 1st, 2nd or 3rd place badge only and on more than one world. That way it limits the players, yes. But on some worlds they are onto the 12th and 15th kill of the fortress and many alts on those worlds have a badge.
I said in average, of course that there is people who will spend less money, but there is also some players that who will spend much more. 50€ in average for the whole server by player seems ok to me. But no one know the right numbers. Even if its 10€ (it means 50k€ lol)...
I do not like that criteria about badges. It means that old players are necessarily better than new players* I do not agree with that. Some new players manage to understand the game really fast. And there is also some old players who still repeat same mistakes after 20 servers and 20 badges LOL.
About Tiberium Alliances General Discussion
Talk with other players about what is going on in your Command and Conquer: Tiberium Alliances game.1,342 PostsLatest Activity: 17 hours ago
Recent Discussions
- 17 hours ago
- 4 days ago
- 4 days ago