Forum Discussion
- 123wellzNew Novicethere was a 2 year long war in between 2nd and 3rd fortress - ah, the good old days....
- methuselahRetired HeroGot it working, you guys are crushing me. Highest PvP for me is 968 in CB1. Highest PvE for me is 578 in CB2.
"Shinerplunderer;c-2209652" wrote:
I don't suppose that a cheeky player can artificially inflate his PvP score by destroying his alt's bases again and again? Is it supposed to be legal as the destroyed alt can simply place down his base nearby, send a weak attack and get destroyed once more.
All it takes is a low level command center, a tiberium harvester, a unit and a high level construction yard... The main account though would not be able to receive anything from such raids however. I'm not going to do this however, I'm just highlighting a possibility.
Use of alts to gain advantage (I know that's why most use them) is not allowed. However, I fail to see what advantage it would give on a competitive world.- XxxDeathDealerxxNew SpectatorProbably not but was just wondering.thought would be cool to know
- delete
- XxxDeathDealerxxNew SpectatorAgree.ive never been a badge chaser.i play for the friends.an try to help.alot of see where the sever leads .as ive been offered to badge . higher than my alliance.for helping main multiple times.i stick with the team .ill promote others up before me.my opinion.many under rated players
- @gamerdruid
You are right from kills that are lower than the level that you should be killing you gain zero RT from them. But a badge chaser will kill them purely for kill count as kill count is what makes them badges. LOL even i have a top ten infected badge maybe i got more i can't remember. But trust me they do all count as numbers of killed infected. I saw it first hand with an alt on some previous Infected rounds. I don't necessarily disagree with the tactic because guys are pushing for kill numbers for a badge, kill numbers is the target nothing else matters for that challenge, so what i mean is it is possible to make it happen easily and therefore it shouldn't really be a factor or stat that is ever used to truly determine G.O.A.T. as it can be a stat that don't really mean much of anything.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just like @XXXDEATHDEALER6x some of the greats hide amongst us and we never really see them on top form. So to determine the G.O.A.T. at playing the game i think its actually very difficult to identify any single player or even a team for that matter as so many variables would need to be considered.
So again i guess we need to go back to 1st place fort kills. Lots of them and often. That is most likely your G.O.A.T. players but you also have a hero or two in the shadows that we love to play beside too. So yes it would be nice to know the G.O.A.T. but for many we already have our own ideas who are actually the G.O.A.T. players. The very best of them i doubt any stats will directly point them out to us.
Clown ? - I just saw today the post, that's a job for me ! B)
Sorry I don't have access to all worlds, but almost ! (307 worlds)
These are only player that can be seen on worlds (since they are hidden after x days)
Here are few world records :
Most active worlds = players that still have account in rank = has logged in since x days (because the game clean inactive players from rank after x days I don't remember how many days)
World42Dummy is my acc that's fake record ^^ - Dam i thought i might have been on one of them lists ?
Nice work. - XxxDeathDealerxxNew SpectatorGreatest of all time
About Tiberium Alliances General Discussion
Talk with other players about what is going on in your Command and Conquer: Tiberium Alliances game.
1,182 PostsLatest Activity: 15 hours agoRelated Posts
Recent Discussions
- 15 hours ago
- 3 days ago
- 8 days ago
- 8 days ago