Ranked Worlds/Elite Worlds Idea
I want to suggest something new and something cool, Ranked Worlds. A year ago i suggested to give penalty to players who destroyed the fortress, now i have a better idea. The idea behind "Ranked...
Forum Discussion
Winner team with stricted movements for months - say leveling the armies from 65 to (what level)? - is not so interesting to keep the activity on a healthy level.
- The tactics would be changed on the original server, not else. Winner would wait with badging until the whole alliance family is strong enough to repell all the attempts of dethroning.
You fear of high level players, but I do not know the reason since you have the same circumstances to be as big as they are.
Penalty for being a winner is not a so good idea. Following your thoughts, you shall be fired from your workplace if you are the most succesfull worker - to give place for the lazy and less smart ones. This way, the workplace would be lack of real challenge and the quality would be lowered in every branches of the operation. In real life, the well educated and motivated person would never have a chance to get the position what he deserves.
- The tactics would be changed on the original server, not else. Winner would wait with badging until the whole alliance family is strong enough to repell all the attempts of dethroning.
You fear of high level players, but I do not know the reason since you have the same circumstances to be as big as they are.
Penalty for being a winner is not a so good idea. Following your thoughts, you shall be fired from your workplace if you are the most succesfull worker - to give place for the lazy and less smart ones. This way, the workplace would be lack of real challenge and the quality would be lowered in every branches of the operation. In real life, the well educated and motivated person would never have a chance to get the position what he deserves.
