Forum Discussion
8 years ago
"gamerdruid;c-1949183" wrote:...
From what I can see in the pattern of launches, it is often when the last world reaches a set proportion (something like 90% or 95% full) that the next is announced.
I think you are right... But they should look at some stats for that world first to see how active some guys are in there.
I am on most of them, and have started on many to try to get my game-start better, get my 2nd base faster etc.
Many people start a new world and quit it if they don't get a good enough start, as have I sometimes.
But if they would have a PTE server that started with a base at lvl1, or even a training server where you could decide for yourself what values you should start with, I could have trained on my game-starts there instead of in real games.
If I get a really bad start in one world, and then see a new one starting up in a couple of weeks I'd rather try to get a better start there.
But usually (until the new login and not being able to play several accounts at once that is), I would play maybe 3 worlds actively. If they had sent me a message in game stating that I was not active enough in that world so my bases would be ghosted, or removed, or reset or what ever, I would have understood that.
I do have arguments for why that would be wrong too as I had spent funds on getting my bases to that level, and I do see a red flag for complaints being made from such a system...
My point is; even though a world is 90% full do not mean it is 90% active.
It would be better to have fewer worlds but having more activity on them I think.
/Key
About Tiberium Alliances General Discussion
Talk with other players about what is going on in your Command and Conquer: Tiberium Alliances game.1,343 PostsLatest Activity: 17 days ago
Recent Discussions
- 3 days ago
- 11 days ago
- 14 days ago