Celebrities

After the comic com event in the family guy game, I was wondering the same thing. I think they should add celeberties to the game, and honestly if they make them all premium the family guy game will definitely have an upper hand, because they gave them for free.

Also this is a bit off topic, but it's crazy how fast family guy caught up to tapped out in regards to content. They're seriously dominating in the realm. This should really light a fire under the developers butts! :lol:

AJtheboss1 wrote:
After the comic com event in the family guy game, I was wondering the same thing. I think they should add celeberties to the game, and honestly if they make them all premium the family guy game will definitely have an upper hand, because they gave them for free.

Also this is a bit off topic, but it's crazy how fast family guy caught up to tapped out in regards to content. They're seriously dominating in the realm. This should really light a fire under the developers butts! :lol:

Isnt that just because Tapped Out is two years old and Family Guy is ... what? Three months?

richardaca969 wrote:

AJtheboss1 wrote:
After the comic com event in the family guy game, I was wondering the same thing. I think they should add celeberties to the game, and honestly if they make them all premium the family guy game will definitely have an upper hand, because they gave them for free.

Also this is a bit off topic, but it's crazy how fast family guy caught up to tapped out in regards to content. They're seriously dominating in the realm. This should really light a fire under the developers butts! :lol:

Isnt that just because Tapped Out is two years old and Family Guy is ... what? Three months?

5 months but I do know what you're getting at

Family guy can never keep this up for two years. Their show related content will run out fast.

The other thing is that the Simpsons universe is so much larger than the Family Guy universe. There are still many Springfielders to add before EA starts adding one-off celebrity guest characters. Although I do agree the Mulder/Scully/Alien idea would be good for Halloween!

I agree that the X-Files and the alien Mr. Burns would be great for Halloween. Other than that, I hope EA holds off with celebrities. We haven't even gotten Helen Lovejoy or Lunch Lady Doris yet.

richardaca969 wrote:

AJtheboss1 wrote:
After the comic com event in the family guy game, I was wondering the same thing. I think they should add celeberties to the game, and honestly if they make them all premium the family guy game will definitely have an upper hand, because they gave them for free.

Also this is a bit off topic, but it's crazy how fast family guy caught up to tapped out in regards to content. They're seriously dominating in the realm. This should really light a fire under the developers butts! :lol:

Isnt that just because Tapped Out is two years old and Family Guy is ... what? Three months?

That's true. They are playing catch up, but the speed that they did it in is amazing if you ask me. For me they'll never replace tapped out but the content speaks for itself.

AJtheboss1 wrote:

richardaca969 wrote:

AJtheboss1 wrote:
After the comic com event in the family guy game, I was wondering the same thing. I think they should add celeberties to the game, and honestly if they make them all premium the family guy game will definitely have an upper hand, because they gave them for free.

Also this is a bit off topic, but it's crazy how fast family guy caught up to tapped out in regards to content. They're seriously dominating in the realm. This should really light a fire under the developers butts! :lol:

Isnt that just because Tapped Out is two years old and Family Guy is ... what? Three months?

That's true. They are playing catch up, but the speed that they did it in is amazing if you ask me. For me they'll never replace tapped out but the content speaks for itself.

The problem with the game is they have a limited number of characters, and of those characters only a small number have alternate skins so eventually they are going to have resort to continuing parodies large events involving the main characters which gets very boring.

This is where TSTO differs greatly and why it'll stay fresh, the depth of the content and what they can do with it.

efin98 wrote:

The problem with the game is they have a limited number of characters, and of those characters only a small number have alternate skins so eventually they are going to have resort to continuing parodies large events involving the main characters which gets very boring.

This is where TSTO differs greatly and why it'll stay fresh, the depth of the content and what they can do with it.

Mmmmmmmmm i don't know. It is getting harder or TSTO to stay fresh, with their ever depleting list of relevant characters. If all were ever going to get are updates with 2 buildings and 2 1-shot characters, even if they continue with the same formula, I wouldn't say thats fresh. And any more events featuring holidays that were not visited by Jack Skellington in the Nightmare before Christmas is just going to pile on more of the same crap that everyone complains about. Anymore thanksgiving, easter, patricks day, or valentines day content is definitely not fresh.

Now mind you, the other game may end up having the same problem, but right from the start, they've been pulling to make events that go places that TSTO hasn't dared to go. And they did that because they don't have the minor characters TSTO has, so they literally have to keep it fresh. And yeah there are problems. You buy a lot of weird stuff that doesn't fit in the town, but thats its own issue.

My point is TSTO can't just be fresh, relying on its character roster and holiday events alone. They need to pull off some more Stonecutters and whacking day type events, which doesn't happen enough, whereas FG is all about making the most out of events. FG has been more inventive, mainly because they have to be.