11 years ago
Congratz Josh
I wondered this too.... seems outright unfair by the looks of the existing *locked* thread. He didn't say anything offensive.
spAnser wrote:DamnedDonuts wrote:
Nobody is against you, we just need consistency in enforcement.
Consistency... Yep that is really what I am looking for, but honestly I still don't see how someone can combine all the different posts into the thread and make a complaint about asians and feet when they were never used in the same post or in reply to each other. Just because the post started about Josh and asian characters and the thread derailed about feet has nothing to do with asians feet at all, so I still don't see how someone got offended unless they were offended about feet. Because none of the feet posts even mentioned asians at all.
chippers29775 wrote:
^ That and the thread started to contain comments about orgasms which probably breaks the age rule for this forum. Most forums have a PG-13 rating. I personally find that the sexualisation of women was a bit uncalled for. Why is it that when a female character appears, people treat them as objects - as if the only thing that they can be related to is sex?
I also find the phrase 'I bet shes wild behind the scenes' offensive. If I were Kumiko, I would be shocked and scared. And as part of the female population, I find it rude for someone to be talking about it with other people. Sure, there is a freedom of speech, and everyone is entitled to their own thoughts no matter what they are, but posting it on a public forum for discussion by everyone? Such conversations should be limited to bars and men's football nights. Not all topics can be discussed in an open environment.
spAnser wrote:
You hear that guys you cannot use the words: " FOOT , FEET , FETISH, ASIANS , WOMEN, GIRLS" in the same thread on these forums anymore. Probably shouldn't even use the word FETISH ever.
chippers29775 wrote:
^ That and the thread started to contain comments about orgasms which probably breaks the age rule for this forum. Most forums have a PG-13 rating. I personally find that the sexualisation of women was a bit uncalled for. Why is it that when a female character appears, people treat them as objects - as if the only thing that they can be related to is sex?
I also find the phrase 'I bet shes wild behind the scenes' offensive. If I were Kumiko, I would be shocked and scared. And as part of the female population, I find it rude for someone to be talking about so openly it with other people. Sure, there is a freedom of speech, and everyone is entitled to their own thoughts no matter what they are, but posting it on a public forum for discussion by everyone? Such conversations should be limited to bars and men's football nights. Similarly, bridal shower conversations should be limited to bridal showers or the like. Not all topics can be discussed in an open environment.
LPNintendoITA wrote:chippers29775 wrote:just saying. Nowadays from what you see in tv and movies (quote: it seems today that all you see is violence in movies and sex on tv) kids early then 13 see sex.
^ That and the thread started to contain comments about orgasms which probably breaks the age rule for this forum. Most forums have a PG-13 rating. I personally find that the sexualisation of women was a bit uncalled for. Why is it that when a female character appears, people treat them as objects - as if the only thing that they can be related to is sex?
I also find the phrase 'I bet shes wild behind the scenes' offensive. If I were Kumiko, I would be shocked and scared. And as part of the female consensus, I find it rude for someone to be talking about it with other people. Sure, there is a freedom of speech, and everyone is entitled to their own thoughts no matter what they are, but posting it on a public forum for discussion by everyone? Such conversations should be limited to bars and men's football nights. Not all topics can be discussed in an open environment.
and if they enter and read they should be followed by their parents.
but of course that never happens lol
HCoinslot wrote:DamnedDonuts wrote:
It might just be me but for a mod you seem touchy, defensive and severely lacking in confidence.
Try stepping back and taking a breath it helps. Being fair and impartial shouldnt be so stressful. Relax
Nobody is against you, we just need consistency in enforcement.
How do you figure having to play fun police isnt stressful? Nothing a mod ever does will be met with anything but hostility. We've already run several of them off. We dont exactly make it easy on them. Well I dont at least.
spAnser wrote:chippers29775 wrote:
^ That and the thread started to contain comments about orgasms which probably breaks the age rule for this forum. Most forums have a PG-13 rating. I personally find that the sexualisation of women was a bit uncalled for. Why is it that when a female character appears, people treat them as objects - as if the only thing that they can be related to is sex?
I also find the phrase 'I bet shes wild behind the scenes' offensive. If I were Kumiko, I would be shocked and scared. And as part of the female population, I find it rude for someone to be talking about it with other people. Sure, there is a freedom of speech, and everyone is entitled to their own thoughts no matter what they are, but posting it on a public forum for discussion by everyone? Such conversations should be limited to bars and men's football nights. Not all topics can be discussed in an open environment.
Then why not get rid of the offending posts leaving them in the locked thread doesn't mean someone won't get offended when they search for Kumiko and find Josh's locked thread in a month
HCoinslot wrote:
Can we all just agree that once you put "all the moderators are morons" in your signature that any threads you make that are even on the fence are probably going to locked?
Lets put this madness to bed. Didnt we get enough of this out in the "lets self police springfield" thread?
Talk about your The Simpsons: Tapped Out experience with other TSTO players.
49,404 PostsLatest Activity: 14 hours ago