I have to be honest about 3D designs

I like it, but not so much when it starts to be overused.

Ok, so what we have are opinions... (3d art all Ugly) (3d art pretty) (3d art some good/some bad)

I am in the 3 group,
but I challenge everyone who thinks they have or have seen REAL quality 3d Springfield art to upload it here and I challenge JoshSherer to find one that he could honestly say is, at least, not bad... or not "Ugly" :wink:

MacJiggles wrote:
Ok, so what we have are opinions... (3d art all Ugly) (3d art pretty) (3d art some good/some bad)

I am in the 3 group,
but I challenge everyone who thinks they have or have seen REAL quality 3d Springfield art to upload it here and I challenge JoshSherer to find one that he could honestly say is, at least, not bad... or not "Ugly" :wink:

OOOOOOOO! A challenge! /insert dramatic music for effect.

Honestly, have you never issued a challenge before? You ALWAYS insert dramatic music for effect. :roll:

Peace.

Josh, Josh, Josh.... we ALL know you don't like it
It would be surprise for me if you would say, you DO like something :)
But seriously , it's not about a 3d design, it is about general designing
If someone put his heart/time/cash in it (or have got natural talent) they can be stunning
But if you don't care, and do it because other ones do.... they look cra.... not very good
There's thousands of city's, less then half is dissent and just numbers of outstanding
IMO

Sahl908 wrote:

MacJiggles wrote:
but I challenge everyone who thinks they have or have seen REAL quality 3d Springfield art to upload it here and I challenge JoshSherer to find one that he could honestly say is, at least, not bad... or not "Ugly" :wink:

Challenge accepted :D.
This is the best 3D town I have ever seen, by Sk3ly
http://i1354.photobucket.com/albums/q699/sk3ly/e0e367252a86e9794d2c3c4b7fc4153c_zpsbdaafeed.jpg

Holy Shiz-nizzle!!
http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mdve663jg01ro2vj6o1_500.gif

simbass7 wrote:
Josh, Josh, Josh.... we ALL know you don't like it
It would be surprise for me if you would say, you DO like something :)
But seriously , it's not about a 3d design, it is about general designing
If someone put his heart/time/cash in it (or have got natural talent) they can be stunning
But if you don't care, and do it because other ones do.... they look cra.... not very good
There's thousands of city's, less then half is dissent and just numbers of outstanding
IMO

Actually, there are things Josh like. Surprise! Unfortunately, I have signed a non disclosure agreement and can't reveal these things. The only thing I can reveal is he likes ice cream, but I can't say which flavour. Sorry. :(

Peace.

ecneralc wrote:

paulzuk wrote:

JoshSherer wrote:
They're all ugly looking and they never actually look like what you intended them to be. Often times they're so off that you need to tell us what it is. But even if we're able to figure it out, it's still ugly. Sorry for the brutal honesty. It just doesn't work. Ever.

You should have been dishonest about it. The entire universe would have been thrown out of balance. That would have been awesome! :lol:

Saying that, if it's ugly to you. Who am I to argue with an opinion?

Personally, I hate the latest trend in 3D films. They force you to wear glasses that look unseemly. Granted, it's in the dark, but still! Also, by the time the movie is over, I am cross eyed and have a headache. All for a little added depth that doesn't look all that amazing. Plus, it never actually looks like it's in colour! Call me when we can watch 3D films without the stupid glasses thank you!

Peace.

I agree with you all these movies are trying to be 3D and failing only good 3D movie I've ever watched was Avatar that was amazing in 3D as for the glasses the ones they give out at cineplex movie theatres aren't too bad looking but there is some pretty ugly looking glasses out there

I heard Avatar is probably the best 3D movie you can watch. I can imagine why. There was so much visually in that film to give it depth. Most other films lack anything that make the film pop out at you. As far as the glasses are concerned, see pic below. It was humiliating to look like that. Normally, I resemble Cloony. :roll:

Peace.

http://img600.imageshack.us/img600/8110/lawt.jpg

pantuflin007 wrote:

paulzuk wrote:

Saying that, if it's ugly to you. Who am I to argue with an opinion?
Personally, I hate the latest trend in 3D films. They force you to wear glasses that look unseemly. Granted, it's in the dark, but still! Also, by the time the movie is over, I am cross eyed and have a headache. All for a little added depth that doesn't look all that amazing. Plus, it never actually looks like it's in colour! Call me when we can watch 3D films without the stupid glasses thank you!

Peace.

You crack me up Paulzuk.

I am innocent! :wink:

Peace.

EDIT: added quote

To be fair, anything that can and does happen within the game, Josh hates. So this really has nothing to do with 3D designs at all.

I agree with the original post as well. If EA intended for us to have hills, tall buildings, etc., they would have created elements to create hills, tall buildings, etc. Occasionally, they work (using stone walls as steps) but in general, they don't really look good.

ephphoneapps wrote:
To be fair, anything that can and does happen within the game, Josh hates. So this really has nothing to do with 3D designs at all.

I think He like the game, he like 3d and he like complaining
He play a character, and I think we need him here
If you post something, everyone's like WOW and OMG , but he can be honest :)

I agree the full on 3d buildings are a bit of an eye sore. However with the double high fences and using hedges to create elevations does sometimes work.