Forum Discussion
9 years ago
someonewashere wrote:I agree with both of these statementsskollthewolf wrote:
I, for one, hope that it's not like Springfield Heights. By its very nature the Badlands needs to be far, far away. Like Krustyland far away. It would look really stupid to be in the Heights and see desert just on the other side of the mountain.
Another reason is because of the decoration limit. If it's in the main Springfield it counts against the limit, but if it's like Krustyland it won't.
Just my two cents. Honestly I'll be happy either way, but if I had a choice I'd go with Krustyland-style.
Agreed, i understand why people want land expansions: more space for their stuff or for others more space in-between their stuff, but the thing is without an increased decoration limit more land is pointless, and if the decoration limit is increased you'll have the issue of the game being very laggy.
The logical solution would be a separate area like Krustyland, however i would suggest that this separate area and springfield share various (if not all) items, that way items can be placed in both areas, allowing our inventories to be less clogged, and to make it feel like we have some control.
Obviously the simpson house, flanders and certain buildings should remain in SF but i digress.
About The Simpsons Tapped Out General Discussion
Talk about your The Simpsons: Tapped Out experience with other TSTO players.
49,403 PostsLatest Activity: 7 hours agoRelated Posts
Recent Discussions
- 7 hours ago
- 4 days ago