Is Anyone Else Surprised...

panam787 wrote:
"It should reflect the views of the whole country, which are for the most part favorable on the second and gun ownership not just the views of California!!"

Interesting, so we should curtail First Amendment speech rights to the "majority opinion" which, for the record, heavily supported background check reform (passed with the brave assistance of the NRA against the wishes of 90% of the population.

On what do you base your normative claim that a free game made by a private company needs to embrace your view or the majority view for that matter? You know the only thing more obnoxious than the gun debate is the self-proclaimed "victim status" of gun owners.

You live(d) in a country with the laxest gun laws in any stable Western nation. You are protected by the strongest lobby in the United States, and you have managed to block even the least controversial most common sense gun reforms on the federal level since this debate began. Your claim of right is an amibiguous sentence in a document (that literally only grants the right to STATES to control gun ownership) that was written when an "arm" was a front-loading musket and penned in the same ink as the 3/5 compromise.

And you sit on this forum literally throwing a tantrum because the rest of us have the audacity to have a little fun at your expense, while you perpetuate an agenda that has made the quality of life lower for the rest of us.

And just so you are aware, you have won the debate not on the merit of your argument, but because it is peddled by a very wealthy minority group - gun manufacturers - who have a compelling interest in lax gun laws that they exploit to realize large profits indirectly through a robust secondary black market. The biggest joke of all is that the people who are really playing you aren't EA Games or The Simpsons Creators, it's Smith & Wesson and Glock.