Prove that the boxes are not so "random"

MR_Plow123 wrote:
I agree that OPs one instance in no way proves any thing.

I am kind of curious about what would be considered "fair" though. Just to be clear, this is by far my least favorite event and it's definitely decreased my enjoyment and time spent in the game.
With that out of the way, we've known the probability of getting anything and getting everything essentially since day one of the event. That hasn't changed, and that information isn't new. I feel like the odds suck, but I don't see how "fairness" fits into the equation. Would they be more fair if the odds of winning were larger? Is that the jump people are making? Because the definition I'm thinking of for "fair" is based on whether or not everyone has the same odds of winning the prize. Which is the case here.

There's a lot wrong with with the update, but no one is getting an unjust advantage over someone else.

"Fair" would be the actual chance of working your way through enough boxes without spending hundreds of donuts. Instead of guaranteeing the boxes after 82 times, they should have cut that down to 40 boxes. Based on the math above, that is. So that for those fanatics that actually zapped their towns every 4 hours, visited all 100 friends everyday, and exchanged every single egg with a basket that they could have, would be rewarded for their ridiculous devotion to game play. That is how all the prior events have been. If they did this, then they would still make plenty of money from those players that couldn't wait, were not that devoted to the game play, or that wanted to purchase multiple items. Actually make the baskets decorations as well, premium of course, and people would buy them. Don't think I'm right, well as proof I reference EA's reports of record profits from their mobile series, with TSTO leading the way, clearing over $100 million in just 3 quarters of 2013.