The Best Tapped Out Character! (Wiggum vs. The Grumple)

Between Agnes and Stu, I say hands down Stu. He speaks, and his sound bites are awesome. Although I like all of Agnes' outside tasks, I like Stu's more.
Agnes' task with the Comic Book Guy is one of my top 3, but Stu is just too cool.

Disco Stu wins against Agnes 15-9.

What characters received byes and why?

waxves_ wrote:
Didnt hugs Bunny have 50 something votes? Wow such a bad tournament, not even accurate. & I'm also pretty sure CCL & Sideshow should have still been on the tournament unless you decided to say some "*" rigged those polls as well

Oh and like you know how everything went down. It's obvious that the poll was adjusted by some troll. Take a few of the matches. Dolph vs. Costington: 12-8, 20 total votes. Boobarella vs Dewey Largo: 15-2, 17 total votes. Lenny vs. Shary Bobbins: 11-7, 18 total votes. Now take a look at Hugs Bunny vs. Milhouse. 20-52. Also, Crazy Cat Lady didn't even lose by a huge margin. It was 24-23 when the hour turned. Same for Sideshow, 11-9.

crosby357 wrote:

waxves_ wrote:
Didnt hugs Bunny have 50 something votes? Wow such a bad tournament, not even accurate. & I'm also pretty sure CCL & Sideshow should have still been on the tournament unless you decided to say some "*" rigged those polls as well

Oh and like you know how everything went down. It's obvious that the poll was adjusted by some troll. Take a few of the matches. Dolph vs. Costington: 12-8, 20 total votes. Boobarella vs Dewey Largo: 15-2, 17 total votes. Lenny vs. Shary Bobbins: 11-7, 18 total votes. Now take a look at Hugs Bunny vs. Milhouse. 20-52. Also, Crazy Cat Lady didn't even lose by a huge margin. It was 24-23 when the hour turned. Same for Sideshow, 11-9.

Lots of people probably voted for Hugs because it was such an absurd match up. That's why I did it. Changing the results because you didn't like how they turned out is kind of lame.

jraffa50 wrote:

crosby357 wrote:

waxves_ wrote:
Didnt hugs Bunny have 50 something votes? Wow such a bad tournament, not even accurate. & I'm also pretty sure CCL & Sideshow should have still been on the tournament unless you decided to say some "*" rigged those polls as well

Oh and like you know how everything went down. It's obvious that the poll was adjusted by some troll. Take a few of the matches. Dolph vs. Costington: 12-8, 20 total votes. Boobarella vs Dewey Largo: 15-2, 17 total votes. Lenny vs. Shary Bobbins: 11-7, 18 total votes. Now take a look at Hugs Bunny vs. Milhouse. 20-52. Also, Crazy Cat Lady didn't even lose by a huge margin. It was 24-23 when the hour turned. Same for Sideshow, 11-9.

Lots of people probably voted for Hugs because it was such an absurd match up. That's why I did it. Changing the results because you didn't like how they turned out is kind of lame.

That's rich. I seriously doubt 52 people voted on a poll option on a poll that normally only gets about 20 - 30 total votes just because "it was an absurd matchup." Why are you still complaining about this? Does it really affect you so much that you have to constantly whine over it?

crosby357 wrote:

jraffa50 wrote:

crosby357 wrote:

waxves_ wrote:
Didnt hugs Bunny have 50 something votes? Wow such a bad tournament, not even accurate. & I'm also pretty sure CCL & Sideshow should have still been on the tournament unless you decided to say some "*" rigged those polls as well

Oh and like you know how everything went down. It's obvious that the poll was adjusted by some troll. Take a few of the matches. Dolph vs. Costington: 12-8, 20 total votes. Boobarella vs Dewey Largo: 15-2, 17 total votes. Lenny vs. Shary Bobbins: 11-7, 18 total votes. Now take a look at Hugs Bunny vs. Milhouse. 20-52. Also, Crazy Cat Lady didn't even lose by a huge margin. It was 24-23 when the hour turned. Same for Sideshow, 11-9.

Lots of people probably voted for Hugs because it was such an absurd match up. That's why I did it. Changing the results because you didn't like how they turned out is kind of lame.

That's rich. I seriously doubt 72 people voted on a poll that normally only gets about 20 - 30 votes just because "it was an absurd matchup." Why are you still complaining about this? Does it really affect you so much that you have to constantly whine over it?

Well this thread keeps bumping up so I keep remembering I have questions about it.

Free Hugs Bunny!!!

jraffa50 wrote:

crosby357 wrote:

jraffa50 wrote:

crosby357 wrote:

waxves_ wrote:
Didnt hugs Bunny have 50 something votes? Wow such a bad tournament, not even accurate. & I'm also pretty sure CCL & Sideshow should have still been on the tournament unless you decided to say some "*" rigged those polls as well

Oh and like you know how everything went down. It's obvious that the poll was adjusted by some troll. Take a few of the matches. Dolph vs. Costington: 12-8, 20 total votes. Boobarella vs Dewey Largo: 15-2, 17 total votes. Lenny vs. Shary Bobbins: 11-7, 18 total votes. Now take a look at Hugs Bunny vs. Milhouse. 20-52. Also, Crazy Cat Lady didn't even lose by a huge margin. It was 24-23 when the hour turned. Same for Sideshow, 11-9.

Lots of people probably voted for Hugs because it was such an absurd match up. That's why I did it. Changing the results because you didn't like how they turned out is kind of lame.

That's rich. I seriously doubt 72 people voted on a poll that normally only gets about 20 - 30 votes just because "it was an absurd matchup." Why are you still complaining about this? Does it really affect you so much that you have to constantly whine over it?

Well this thread keeps bumping up so I keep remembering I have questions about it.

Free Hugs Bunny!!!

But why do you keep questioning it? Why is this such an important factor that you have to constantly ask questions and figure out what's going on? It's just a little tournament that I made for fun and now you have to constantly figure out flaws with it?

I voted for Chester.

I am enjoying the tournament. Unfortunately, I have missed many of the votes but will continue to vote when I see it.

crosby357 wrote:

jraffa50 wrote:

crosby357 wrote:

jraffa50 wrote:

crosby357 wrote:

waxves_ wrote:
Didnt hugs Bunny have 50 something votes? Wow such a bad tournament, not even accurate. & I'm also pretty sure CCL & Sideshow should have still been on the tournament unless you decided to say some "*" rigged those polls as well

Oh and like you know how everything went down. It's obvious that the poll was adjusted by some troll. Take a few of the matches. Dolph vs. Costington: 12-8, 20 total votes. Boobarella vs Dewey Largo: 15-2, 17 total votes. Lenny vs. Shary Bobbins: 11-7, 18 total votes. Now take a look at Hugs Bunny vs. Milhouse. 20-52. Also, Crazy Cat Lady didn't even lose by a huge margin. It was 24-23 when the hour turned. Same for Sideshow, 11-9.

Lots of people probably voted for Hugs because it was such an absurd match up. That's why I did it. Changing the results because you didn't like how they turned out is kind of lame.

That's rich. I seriously doubt 72 people voted on a poll that normally only gets about 20 - 30 votes just because "it was an absurd matchup." Why are you still complaining about this? Does it really affect you so much that you have to constantly whine over it?

Well this thread keeps bumping up so I keep remembering I have questions about it.

Free Hugs Bunny!!!

But why do you keep questioning it? Why is this such an important factor that you have to constantly ask questions and figure out what's going on? It's just a little tournament that I made for fun and now you have to constantly figure out flaws with it?

I had asked why you did a tournament with random pairings and without a posted bracket. You didn't answer. I think this could have been a really fun thing if it was done right, an instead you get defensive about it because of how you set it up. Then you start randomly changing the results. So it doesn't make any sense to me and it's become a bit of a joke.