[Player Career]
Did Zubieta win Player of the Match because of his high success rate?
I believe SAIKA contributed more to the team. If so, was that not included in the selection criteria?
Both players have the same overall rating, but SAIKA has more goals and assists. Which player contributed more to the team and performed well enough to secure the victory?
Figures 1 and 2 show the match ratings.
Saika started the game, scored 10 goals, and was substituted out.
Figure 3 shows the news about the Player of the Match winner.
Saika scored all of his goals by stealing the ball from opponents and scoring directly.
Although he was substituted, Saika received a perfect rating of 10.0.
The Player of the Match played the entire game and received a rating of 8.2.
Furthermore, Saika scored the 10 decisive goals that secured the victory.
Why was the Player of the Match a player with an 8.2 rating?
After Saika was substituted, the opponents scored one goal.
This indicates that the Player of the Match was selected as the highest-rated player who played the full match.
Does this align with the criteria for selecting the Player of the Match?
Who was the most influential player in this match?
Isn't this a bug?
