Apex can reclaim its throne by getting rid of aim assist.
I want an experimental event with no aim assist.
Forum Discussion
It is good to see that there is a possibility for us to understand each other.
My opinion is consistent. It is impossible to create the same experience with completely different devices like a controller and MnK, and to maintain fairness, separating the servers is the more realistic solution.
I am not talking about the numerical difference in specs. I am saying that controllers and MnK are entirely different things to begin with.
I agree with the opinion that where to draw the line depends on the developer's discretion. The current situation is exactly the result of that.
However, if you had the intention to just endure and use what was given, you wouldn't have stated your opinion here, right?
I do not deny that AA is powerful and a sense of unfairness is arising. It should be corrected. However, I do not agree with the idea that AA should just be removed. It would only change the form of the unfairness.
It is impossible to bring the same experience to devices that are completely different things through small adjustments. It is more realistic to ensure fairness by separating the servers. (It is not easy.)
You keep saying we understand each other, but you clearly don't understand me at all. The core of my argument is that AA could be the reason the game is in decline.
I’m not denying that AA is strong, but I never said it makes the game 'boring' just because of its strength. I only addressed its power in response to your counterargument—I didn't bring it up as my own complaint.
"if you had the intention to just endure and use what was given, you wouldn't have stated your opinion here, right?" This sentence doesn't make sense either. I've told you this before: I’ve hit Solo Master on both MnK and controller. I can play both at a high level, and that’s exactly why I’m qualified to make this point.
And what do you even mean by 'just changing the form of unfairness'? Can you actually explain what would become unfair and how? I’m waiting for specifics.
Your arguments are always so abstract, and you conveniently ignore the questions I ask about the obvious flaws in your logic. On top of that, you claim I'm being 'hostile' just because I’m disagreeing with you? That makes no sense at all. Disagreement isn't hostility. If you can't handle a critique of your logic, don't start a debate.
Certainly, I noted a "possibility" for mutual understanding and welcomed it, but that is distinct from reaching a final agreement.
You stated, "I only addressed its power in response to your counterargument—I didn't bring it up as my own complaint," but I find this impossible to reconcile with your post. Your title and the core of your argument explicitly demand the removal of AA. It is fundamentally contradictory to seek the abolition of a system you claim not to be dissatisfied with.
Regarding participation, this forum is a platform provided for all customers to provide feedback. Every player, regardless of their skill level, is entitled to express their honest opinion. Whatever your skill level or status may be, I would have said the same: I oppose your conclusion to remove AA. While I agree with the premise that AA is powerful and that measures are necessary for the sake of fairness, I cannot support the total removal of the system.
I have already provided specific examples regarding the structural differences between devices. AA serves to compensate for those inherent limitations. If AA is simply removed, the physical disparity remains unaddressed; therefore, as I stated, it would only change the "form" of the unfairness.
I am not ignoring you. On the contrary, I am only being asked questions for which what I have already mentioned provides the answer. Although I reached the conclusion of opposing the removal of AA, haven't I already agreed with the process leading to your proposal, such as the fact that AA is powerful and the importance of fairness?
Do you honestly think every idea to improve a game only comes from being salty? I never said the root of the problem is just 'AA is too strong.' You’re framing my argument as if I’m just whining about aim assist, and that’s exactly what I’m calling you out on. Sure, I might have said something like that five years ago, but things change.
Look, anyone can drop an opinion here, but if you’re going to claim your take is 'right,' you obviously need a logical basis for it. I’m simply pointing out that your reasoning is weak.
You keep bringing up the hardware differences between devices, but what actually matters is the in-game performance gap. If physical specs were the only issue, would you say the gap between someone on 1fps vs 300fps is smaller than MnK vs Controller? Obviously not.
When you buy a PC, MnK is the standard; a controller is an optional extra. Wouldn't it be more 'fair' for MnK to be the baseline? Besides, we’re seeing players now who can track just like MnK even without AA. Controllers naturally excel at consistent tracking speed compared to mice, while mice have to deal with downsides like mouse drift. You’re calling things 'unfair' while completely ignoring these facts, and honestly, it makes no sense.
I have never denied that AA is powerful or that measures need to be taken. I acknowledge both the disparity between devices and the necessity of addressing it.
Let me repeat this until you understand:
I oppose your conclusion to remove AA. While I agree with the premise that AA is powerful and that measures are necessary for the sake of fairness, I cannot support the total removal of the system.
The reason you feel I am "ignoring your questions" is because you have failed to understand my previous explanations. I already said, "I am not ignoring you. On the contrary, I am only being asked questions for which what I have already mentioned provides the answer."
Answering questions based on false premises only promotes further misunderstanding. That is not what I call a dialogue.
I am not seeking your agreement. I only want you to correctly understand what I have stated. I would welcome proceeding to the next question after you have understood what I said.
Featured Places
