Apex can reclaim its throne by getting rid of aim assist.
I want an experimental event with no aim assist.
Forum Discussion
Do you honestly think every idea to improve a game only comes from being salty? I never said the root of the problem is just 'AA is too strong.' You’re framing my argument as if I’m just whining about aim assist, and that’s exactly what I’m calling you out on. Sure, I might have said something like that five years ago, but things change.
Look, anyone can drop an opinion here, but if you’re going to claim your take is 'right,' you obviously need a logical basis for it. I’m simply pointing out that your reasoning is weak.
You keep bringing up the hardware differences between devices, but what actually matters is the in-game performance gap. If physical specs were the only issue, would you say the gap between someone on 1fps vs 300fps is smaller than MnK vs Controller? Obviously not.
When you buy a PC, MnK is the standard; a controller is an optional extra. Wouldn't it be more 'fair' for MnK to be the baseline? Besides, we’re seeing players now who can track just like MnK even without AA. Controllers naturally excel at consistent tracking speed compared to mice, while mice have to deal with downsides like mouse drift. You’re calling things 'unfair' while completely ignoring these facts, and honestly, it makes no sense.
I have never denied that AA is powerful or that measures need to be taken. I acknowledge both the disparity between devices and the necessity of addressing it.
Let me repeat this until you understand:
I oppose your conclusion to remove AA. While I agree with the premise that AA is powerful and that measures are necessary for the sake of fairness, I cannot support the total removal of the system.
The reason you feel I am "ignoring your questions" is because you have failed to understand my previous explanations. I already said, "I am not ignoring you. On the contrary, I am only being asked questions for which what I have already mentioned provides the answer."
Answering questions based on false premises only promotes further misunderstanding. That is not what I call a dialogue.
I am not seeking your agreement. I only want you to correctly understand what I have stated. I would welcome proceeding to the next question after you have understood what I said.
Featured Places
