Apex can reclaim its throne by getting rid of aim assist.
I want an experimental event with no aim assist.
Forum Discussion
c0123456789 I do not believe that the removal of the aim assist would be good for the game much for the same reasons as Akipekopeko had stated, (although I'm sure the aim assist could use a bit of a rework).
I will also like to point out one of a few contradictions from you, such as you saying that you weren't talking about players being good or bad and then went into talking about Hal playing on a controller and prior to that, you had said:
Having "weaker" enemies overall can actually be a benefit for casuals.
Which to me, Hal would be "good" and the weaker players would be "bad", (thus talking about being good or bad), however besides that, what I was trying to say is that the aim assist, (from my experiences), doesn't instantly make someone a god at the game, rather you may be seeing cheaters.
However, players like Hal are actually good at the game, (which suggests that they use the aim assist to their advantage, but they do also give up so much of their movement capabilities in the process).
Anyways, my opinion on the aim assist isn't as comprehensive as the others here, so I do not have much more to say that would add on to or benefit this conversation.
Note: I did also merge your other thread with this one since this thread was more active.
”First off, read what I actually wrote, I'm not really about whether a player is "good" or "bad". I've hit Master rank solo using both MnK and controller. I agree that aim isn't the only thing that defines skill, but it's still a massive factor. If aim didn't matter, aim-bot cheaters wouldn't be a threat but we all know that's not case. Plz re-read my previous point.
Then explain ImperialHal's switch to controller. If aim assist doesn't matter, go beat his legacy on MnK after switching from controller. I'll wait.”
The message above is the one I sent you earlier. Since you didn’t seem to understand it, I’ll explain it briefly.
That’s not even what I was talking about strength is determined by AA. My point was that you're wrong even if we follow your logic—the thing about Hal was just a simple example to show that.
Featured Places
