Control LTM Feedback Megathread
- When the enemy is dominating the middle objective, and you sneak around to capture the controlpoint near the enemy base, nobody can even spawn there. For me this takes away all of the tactical poin...
Forum Discussion
@TheApexLegendNub I do like the idea of filling players and I have seen it can work well on some other games.
I think we all experienced the random error causing us the leave penalty at some point in other modes. But we already added that to Arena, it might be easier to add to Control in the meantime than making a new continuous filling system.
Personally I don't think 9v9 is the main attraction point for this mode. They could have done it on Arena if they really want to, smaller map for potentially more action or fights. I just want to express that getting outnumbered in Control mode is especially frustrating.
I think we all experienced the random error causing us the leave penalty at some point in other modes. But we already added that to Arena, it might be easier to add to Control in the meantime than making a new continuous filling system.
Personally I don't think 9v9 is the main attraction point for this mode. They could have done it on Arena if they really want to, smaller map for potentially more action or fights. I just want to express that getting outnumbered in Control mode is especially frustrating.
@ATOMXII The leaver penalty is what ruined Arenas for me, you would queue up and either have a disconnected or afk teammate so you were forced to play as a 2 v 3 and it just wasn’t fun, another thing Apex needs is a surrender option so aslong as over half the people vote yes you would surrender, in 6 v 6 its 4 so in 9 v 9 you would need 5 yes but in Arenas you would only need 2
@TheApexLegendNubI don't play much Arena either. But you can suicide with nades if you really want in Arena but you can't do that in Control. And one Arena match is a quicker than Control I would think. One player leaving in Control would ruin 8 other, but Arena is just 2. Ideally no one would leave, but I'd choose to put penalty on Control instead of Arena.
And it doesn't really make sense to have a surrender system when people can just leave at will as the current state. If people always connect to the same game, maybe that can work. And maybe just leave it to the report system when it comes to afk people.
@ATOMXIISo you want people to get a penalty for code-shoe and other server issues?
I got code-shoe in my very first game today, which would have had me not playing for10 mins when i wanted to play if there was a penalty.
They used to be able to bring back players into lobbies and i truly don't have the slightest clue why they disabled that feature.- @CrazieAtesPS4 Code-shoe is not the issue here. If people can't connect back, it's a server/system issue. System misjudging people having error vs leaving, it's a different issue. I just want to focus on the those who intentionally left a Control game, especially when they're on the losing side. I think the impact of getting outnumbered on Control is more significant than other modes. If Arena can have it, I don't see why Control can't. Leaver penalty may not be the ultimate solution, but I think it can be a quick fix to help alleviate the current situation.
- @ATOMXII Penalty on ranked arena more important than non-ranked. Penalty on control important because a lot of people are wasting their time if the mode becomes imbalanced.
Featured Places
