Does Respawn not understand statistics or are they just biased noobs towards P?
"but out of the three Legends in the recon class (Pathfinder, Crypto, and Bloodhound), one dominates in terms of in-game performance. (It’s the robot. The robot dominates.)"
Are we going to talk about this joke? It seems that Respawn does not understand how logic works and that statistically you are never going to have legends equally win in battles unless you completely remove skill from the game and effectively give all players equal chances of winning regardless of how good or bad they are. This is the direction of the game since the past 3 seasons, becoming more and more noob friendly, which can be proven solely by the decreased TTK.
Nevermind the fact that different abilities tailor to different kinds of players, and when you have a character that does not have an advantage in battle like Pathfinder, it is only natural that its base players will be ones who rely solely on skill to win battles, and will therefore naturally be better players than ones who are used to relying on their ultimate ability to give them an advantage to win like Bloodhound. Do they even listen to pros, people who actually know the game? Path has one of the biggest hit boxes in the game with "low profile", a tactical that has been rendered useless because you could only use once every two squad fights, and now no passive?