Me being "dumb" would still make me phenomenally smarter than you.
As to your main point, I already explained the justification for aim-assist multiple times. The prognosis is that you just have mediocre aim but want to blame something for your consistently poor performance. I play with several PC players and haven't received a single complaint from them about aim-assist. They have never even brought it up. And I don't know why you using the term "aimbot". "Aimbots" snap the user's sights directly to a target's head and make the bullets streamline directly into it. Aim-assist slowly tracks close to mid-range targets in the middle of the player's screen to provide slightly-easier targeting as compensation for the very-limited input intricacy that a joy-stick allows.
@matzesingt wrote:But every single pc player that plays with controller does it cuz he sucks at aiming or he wants to abuse Aimassist, and thats the truth, there is no other explanation, NOONE on the planet will take all the backdraws of a controller if there were no aimassist
You completely fail to follow your own line of logic here. Aim assist is not a system that can auto-pilot a user's hand-eye coordination. If a user has poor hand-eye coordination, then they might find the use of a joystick to be more accommodating because of the restricted input freedom. That can allow a player with bad hand skills to prevent the impediment of their own gameplay. But aim-assist is not a "crutch" for people to use. If a player is just bad at aiming in any situation, then aim-assist is not going to help them. This is really not that complicated.
Either way, even if the controller player can land every shot, they still have to do around 600 damage to wipe your whole team. All you have to do is deal around 200 damage to them. If you’re getting 1v3’d, then you must be getting majorly outplayed, or are not hitting your shots at all.
Community Manager
