Need to be able to block players so you don't play with them at all.

That argument is based on a somewhat ridiculous assumption. Most people can tell when they come across a cheater. The more likely outcome is that the cheaters would end up in a lobby all of their own... Which is probably where they belong?

I do hope that is correct. Can anyone confirm this?  In the ea description of blocking is seems to imply that only communication is blocked,

I've just noticed that the block option only seems to appear for the suspect / obvious cheaters. It's as if EA have already marked some accounts as suspect and then give a block option. If there is no block option you can take it you were downed without the aid of a hack.  Cool.

@Srksii 

I would 100% much rather wait 2 hours for one good game, vs. play 25 trash games in 2 hours. I don't understand the mindset of, more bad games is better than 1 good game.

It's not rage blocking when my random teammate runs away from me and my freind without pinging and dies. Leaving us handicapped. I never want to play with these people who act like they are playing solos. In all my time playing Apex, in both casual, ranked and LTM modes, I have only experienced TWO good random third teammates. In 3,000 games played only two have gotten me a decent random teammate.

The avoid play list could even be temporary like in Overwatch. If you avoid a player on Overwatch, they will not be put on your team for about 2 days. Then you will be able to have them as a teammate again.

Apex needs an avoid player feature. If it got one, then these absolutley brain dead single cell organisims may learn their lesson as they cannot find a single match.

These solo players are destroying the experience for lots of people. It's not fun. All I ask for is a teammate who plays as a team.

If the "team" means a Pathfinder and Octane taking all the loot and run to their death when I as Caustic still "I need a weapon" then I prefer to play solo.

@Bad_Omens_4U 

I am fairly sure you cant stop a player from being matched in the same lobby and personally, I think it would so quite stupid if you could. 

First of all; people would just start to block high elo players either consciously because they dont like getting steam rolled or  because they THINK they are hackers. You say that most people know if they meet a hacker? I must beg to differ. Most average or below skilled players cant tell the difference between a hacker and a legit Predator player, because the difference between the encounter of a, lets say "hardstuck gold" player and a cheater and same hardstuck gold player and a predator is pretty much inseparable. The gold player will die in 0.8 seconds vs the hacker instead of 1 second vs the predator.

Secondly; After a while, when enough people blocked enough of other players,  It would be a "logical" nightmare to create lobbies in which EVERY player in that lobby had NO blocked players with them. Just think about it logically. Player A blocks player B who blocks player C who blocks player D..........etc etc all the way to ...who blocks Player Z... Suddenly you have a situation  where 26 players  cant be in the same lobby and therefore needs 26 unique lobbies just to get into a game. Trust me; it might seem like a no big deal, but it is.