Forum Discussion
- NickBeam273 years agoSeasoned Ace
I agree, no passive should make the difference in a fire fight.
I also feel no Ultimate should be an actual weapon. Seems ridiculous.
Look at armed and dangerous....this is a game mode where only shot guns and snipers are available to be used. Never saw so many ramparts in that last game mode mowing down players only able to use a shotty and sniper, with a mini gun.
Another direction Respawn should have never gone. Stop making Ultimate's be actual weapons.
And for crying out loud - give Pathfinder a passive already!
- 3 years ago
i agree with you for the most part. ultimates shouldnt summon a third extremely powerful weapon to win the fight for you. tacticals and passives shouldnt be on the same level, but i disagree that passives shouldnt make a difference in a fight.
- 3 years ago@BigMacAttack8u Valk's core playstyle is in her passive. If you removed her flight, she'd be pointless. You have to consider how terrible her hitbox is, how slow she moves in the air. Her wings telegraph cover peeks to opponents, and paint a giant "X" on her head.
Valk is a terrible combat Legend. Taking away her flight would destroy her completely. I do like Vantage's movement, though, but her tactical is more similar to Loba's bracelet or Octane's pad.