Old food in a new plate aka S6 :)

That does not remotely qualify as a "pay to win" concept. Pay-to-win only applies to pay-walled items that give an obvious mechanical advantage. Ex: Only being able to use legendary weapons if the player purchased the Battle Pass, or having a pay-to-use weapon in the game that has better stats than the default ones.

Legendary skins, which don't require money to obtain, have different shapes, sizes, and weapon sights. These are not mechanical table-turners.

Season 6 hasn't even released yet, and if we didn't get a new map such as World's Edge we wouldn't even be complaining for new maps in the first place, we should be grateful that entire new maps are even a thing in this game as it certainly isn't in Fortnite.

@TBTFWI can also sort of see what you're trying to say, but your argument becomes irrelevant when you simply continue to bash the developers for everything that isn't entirely true.

An example of your ignorance was when you said they 'ignored' the topic of solo mode and choose map options when they've already stated their thoughts on those concepts in the past and why they weren't a good idea for the game, but you refused to research and just assume it hasn't been adressed yet.

Well Worlds Edge is by far the best of the 2 maps.

But it is way High time fir a third map, given how the core of this game is.  Their maps aren’t versatile like Fortnite, and therefore don’t maintain interest as long, beautiful as they are.

Dataminers are quite wrong, and often, though.  Dataminers somehow couldn’t figure out one bunker of the current KC was for story only.

its possible they whatever was seen is the new map. It’s also possible it’s just for rotation, or for story mode only, or something else. I’m not saying the Dataminers are wrong, but I would never take their discoveries as unquestionably true either.

I don't understand why you're all fighting.  I don't like the fact that it's going to be this map but that's why there are many other games, I understand that you gave a lot of money for the game and you expect them to develop, but not everything can exceed your expectations. I understand that to justify their stagnation with the pandemic is quite lame because because other battle-royal games had no problem with that but you can open 200 topics here and all that will happen is you get tired of writing because neither EA or Respawn come in here and read these things.

I'm not sure what your argument is here. Legendary weapon skins in this game implement a completely different model from the default ones, which means their iron sights are also different. The original argument I was responding to was one in regards to the claim that there was a "pay-to-win" concept in Apex, which there isn't. Legendary skins are not pay-walled, which means any presumed mechanical advantage you think you're getting from a different iron sight is attributed to that specific weapon model, not a "pay-to-win" deal. If you're just arguing that Legendary skins make combat unfair because of iron sights, then that seems like a you problem, because a slightly-modified iron sight shouldn't incur such disproportional inequity that it tips the scales in your combat engagements.

"Affecting perspective" is extremely subjective, and not a developer's fault. The only relevant argument in this scenario would be that weapon stats are disproportionately higher on pay-walled skins (skins that the player can ONLY obtain with real currency). But since your argument seems to be a mere grievance over distinct weapon models, your claim about their effect in combat is largely inconsequential. As I said before, the shape of an iron sight should not be impacting your gameplay. I have dozens of distinct weapon skins that have different iron sights and I don't find any one of them more "difficult" to use than another.