@Unitee01
This is true. Without AA, high elo controllers would be chanceless against high elo M+K players. Not a single current ALGS controller player would qualify. Its actually quite funny to see how dependent pro level controller players are of th AA. So many times an enemy is moving in and out of Bangalore smoke and you can see how the top player on controller totally lose control over the aim every time.
So even if AA is necessary for controllers to be able to compete vs M+K, exactly this is also the "moral" problem isnt it? Because what AA is is literally a soft aimbot. It does things to your input that you arent in control over that, just like we just confirmed, is TOTALLY necessary to be able to compete vs M+K. The competitive fairness of this IS an issue. It doesnt really matter which one is stronger, the DIFFERENCE makes it an issue. I think they simply must let M+K compete vs each other and controllers vs each others.
An analogy could be the reason why the separate women and men in other sports instead of mixing men and women but adding various handicaps for the women. Mixing m+k and controller in the same competition is like mixing men and women in hockey but the women were allowed to be start the match 10 goals ahead, the men had to play on empty stomachs with 1 hours of sleep, the womens goal was 60% smaller and the match started with every women getting one free punch to the face of the men haha ... I mean why even bother.: just separate the competition and we avoid all discussion about whats stronger and whats fair.
PS talking about high elo now. On casual level, I dont care one bit if I play vs controllers. I have NEVER seen a controller teammate when I solo Q that has been good below diamond.