Proposing an anti-teaming system
There should be a system in place for the to game prevent teamers, not just wait for a mass amount of users to die to teamers to report them. This is just an example. Tweak it, propose something bet...
Forum Discussion
@Jojo_Mamaa I've suggested something like this before, but others have pointed out to me that players who play it smart, (and the ones who hide the whole match), might also get flagged for teaming.
So, the system would have to be well programmed to only flag those who are actually teaming.
I've had instances where I had to hide from an enemy team when on my way to a respawn beacon. While I had line of sight on them, they didn't notice I was even there. With the system you proposed, the game would kick me out for "teaming", even though I was only trying not to get eliminated so I could bring back my teammates.
So, the system would have to be well programmed to only flag those who are actually teaming.
I've had instances where I had to hide from an enemy team when on my way to a respawn beacon. While I had line of sight on them, they didn't notice I was even there. With the system you proposed, the game would kick me out for "teaming", even though I was only trying not to get eliminated so I could bring back my teammates.
It's not hard. It just can't draw conclusions at any moment in time. But once it is obvious, the solution is to dock their stats hugely, drop their K/D from 5 to .5, etc... Make them pissed.
It could detect teaming if two teams are in the same room and not shooting each other. But it would have to be over the top obvious that no other conclusion could be drawn.
- @MrGreenWithAGun
"It could detect teaming if two teams are in the same room and not shooting each other."
This won't end teaming. It will create smarter teamers. They will realize that while holed up in that room all they have to do is fire one single bullet at each other and then the teamer detector resets. In exactly the same way that aimbot makers realized they could be detected by consistent 100% accuracy. So they adjusted their software to give the cheater 98% accuracy. Or 94%. They just keep testing the waters until they know exactly where they need to be to fly under the radar.
I don't mean to make this all sound hopeless. But this is all hopeless.@reconzero"I don't mean to make this all sound hopeless. But this is all hopeless. "
Anything is possible, just need to think it all through. I do think my scenario can be realized, just need to study behavior until the conclusion is self evident.
Featured Places
