So why do people want low kill times

---

@And289 wrote:

I have never played COD but I have played RUST I have 1 k hours in rust so I can say I have a bit of experience there a skilled player can kill a better looted player again not saying that it is not possible but just because it is "possible" doesn't mean that it is consistent. Right now it is frustrating emptying a mag into somebody or dealing 280 dmg in one match where you only hit 1 person and still dieing. Again Cod TTK is too low but The current one is too high don't confuse my argument

---

I really don't see what your argument is here. From this post it looks like you're simply frustrated because you're used to just long peek and kill with a single spray. Whereas in this game you gotta do more than that, or be on point with your aim (any weapon except pistols can do over 200 damage with a single non-extended mag and without headshots). But so are your enemies. I can't see you providing any reason why current TTK is objectively bad except pointing out that winning 1v3 is hard which, as I previously described, is a flawed argument.

If all you're saying is that it simply feels off to you then well, it's only been out for days, may take a bit more for you to get used to.

Maybe you just had a patch of rough games, that happens. 280 damage into 1 person is fairly normal even in PUBG, you shouldn't get frustrated over that.

Most importantly, advocating to change the game because winning takes more effort than you'd like sounds very counterproductive and dangerous. Like, I could understand if you were arguing the opposite. How low TTK in a game like PUBG allows a bush camper to kill you with no fight whatsoever. That is cheesy. That leads to toxicity, that is inherently unhealthy. You died basically because his gamble paid off and there was no way for you to respond. That is frustrating. In this game you actually die because you got outplayed in a proper fight and we're complaining about that? All while being noobs playing their first few days? How does that make sense?