Forum Discussion
TheJumpingJawa
6 years agoSeasoned Ace
@redrosekightEA know precisely where the optional price point is for maximum income. (It's where it is right now)
What's less clear is whether they properly consider the financial implications of longer term factors like player investment, public perception & ethical concerns that might result in regulatory change.
6 years ago
@TheJumpingJawa Ethical concerns? They give us a 100% free game with zero pay to win and you talk ethics?
How are they supposed to keep the electricity on if they don't make money? How are they supposed to keep the game functioning if no money is made? Yes Apex would be gone... and we all would have to find a new game.
How are they supposed to keep the electricity on if they don't make money? How are they supposed to keep the game functioning if no money is made? Yes Apex would be gone... and we all would have to find a new game.
- TheJumpingJawa6 years agoSeasoned Ace
@Pure_Funk_Nugget wrote:
@TheJumpingJawaEthical concerns? They give us a 100% free game with zero pay to win and you talk ethics?
How are they supposed to keep the electricity on if they don't make money? How are they supposed to keep the game functioning if no money is made? Yes Apex would be gone... and we all would have to find a new game.I'm referring to their monetisation strategy of targeting a vulnerable demographic; whether that's children who aren't responsible, or adults with addictive personality disorders.