Forum Discussion
Ok thanks just not true. Reading the other comments, on this post it seems like other people have been keeping track and have reached 100s if not 1000s of levels higher than 101.
If people are already getting the apex packs retroactively, there is no reason not to accurately represent the time they've put in. Starting everyone at 101 is a bit of a slap in the face to those who play the most. If anything I would guess it would make those players throw their arms up and quit, while representing progress correctly would encourage more people to play.
I’ll answer it myself: no they didn’t. They weren’t level 300, 507, 1001, they were physically level 100. They just kept ‘leveling up’ but not gaining levels.
So with that said, it’s not necessary to give apex packs based on the level they saw they were. Nobody said they should’ve kept leveling and then when something like this update was announced that they would get compensated for it. Those players should be thankful they at least got 14 free packs.
- 6 years ago
- 6 years ago@jumanjaydazed They could, but even then the ‘I saw my level’ point would be invalid cause he calculated it and didn’t see it on screen ^.^
- 6 years ago
Even if they used no website at all they could just count every time they level up. It just seems pointless not to put people where they would have been. It’s not like it would be a hard thing to do, they have the data. I’m not even talking about Apex Packs, just that the account levels should accurately represent play time. If it will in the future, and they have the ability to make it retroactive, it is my opinion that they should.
About Apex Legends General Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 2 hours ago