Just made a thread below yours with some popular teams using Caustic. In character based games you’ll always have a set of meta characters like in LoL, DOTA and I assume Overwatch too. As the game’s roster continues to grow, it’ll only get harder for them to balnce legends. Some legends will eventually be left out and only good for pubs like LL and Mirage unless a rework happens.
Pretty much as Cheesman said.
I've become bored with ranked as I've said in another thread. The higher in ranked you go, the less interesting it becomes. I mean, if you like to focus on something so devoid of options, akin to making sure you hammer 1 nail straight as a competition, then this is for you.
But I'm pretty sure, since this game is marketed as having tons of legends and options and always adding to the game, the dying variety is not exactly appealing to the masses who play this thing.
I mean every game has a meta I get that, I just think there should be tweaks to the top 3 characters to make them less meta and the bottom 5 to make them more meta.
Is it really a hard thing to do? This is an actual question because some of the fixes the community has mentioned would make the characters much better.
@Cheese9ManLifeline gets ignored because her pick rate it still top 6 or so overall. The lifeline mains will never give up. lol
What I want to do is go back to the beginning of the game and swap the latest legends for the originals and then release the originals. I bet the newer ones pick rates would be higher overall because people feel this loyalty to certain charactwrs.
Gibralter is the perfect example of how difficult it must be to approach balance in a game like this. Close to 100% pick rate in competitive, yet endless cries for a buff from the lower tiers of play.
Community Manager
