The bow is a rifle which makes no sound
Basically the Bow makes no noise, so the hit is much harder to spot where it is being shot from. EDIT: It also has no reload. EDIT 2: also, it seems to be hit-scan when fully charged so no arrow dr...
Forum Discussion
@Koochi-Q wrote:
@Vdstrk
This was to be expected really. Does it fit into the game? No it doesn’t, but of course it would make no sound xD.
I’m guessing that this bow is their entry point for eventually putting silenced weapons in the game. This bow is not a pray and spray weapon but needs proper aim. So if ppl like this (almost) no sound weapon, it gives the devs a green light to introduce silenced weapons cause they will make sound, just less than conventional guns.
Heck they might even make a new component for all guns ‘silencers’.
@MandatoryIDtagI’ve yet to see the bow in action except from what i’ve seen in trailers but you see a trajectory path?
You’re saying all this and haven’t even tried the bow in a game? You really shouldn’t make such an opinionated stance without actually trying it.
@WhoTookCrossfire HAHAHAHA WAIT WHAT?! You kidding me right?
How do you call that an opinionated stance when literally the only opinion here is my first paragraph and that is almost exactly condensed in 3 sentences what you said in your whole previous post but with some alterations on how it would work in your opinion in the game.
Only difference; I have not yet played it. Lolz if I said the bow was OP, take it out of the game, make it have sound and let ppl clearly see the bullet trajectory or anything like that, then yes, that would be an opinionated stance. What I said in the comment you quoted is hardly opinionated but more well-thought out post based on how this game plays.
How do you call that an opinionated stance when literally the only opinion here is my first paragraph and that is almost exactly condensed in 3 sentences what you said in your whole previous post but with some alterations on how it would work in your opinion in the game.
Only difference; I have not yet played it. Lolz if I said the bow was OP, take it out of the game, make it have sound and let ppl clearly see the bullet trajectory or anything like that, then yes, that would be an opinionated stance. What I said in the comment you quoted is hardly opinionated but more well-thought out post based on how this game plays.
@Koochi-Q wrote:
@WhoTookCrossfireHAHAHAHA WAIT WHAT?! You kidding me right?
How do you call that an opinionated stance when literally the only opinion here is my first paragraph and that is almost exactly condensed in 3 sentences what you said in your whole previous post but with some alterations on how it would work in your opinion in the game.
Only difference; I have not yet played it. Lolz if I said the bow was OP, take it out of the game, make it have sound and let ppl clearly see the bullet trajectory or anything like that, then yes, that would be an opinionated stance. What I said in the comment you quoted is hardly opinionated but more well-thought out post based on how this game plays.
I wasn’t just referencing that one post. All of your previous posts had some form of opinion in them and you shouldn’t really be drawing opinions based purely off of what others say.@WhoTookCrossfireYou must not know me... well you don’t cause you’d know I don’t base my interpretations off of others but from what I’ve seen. Please show me all my other posts you’re referring to cause I’ve provided my feedback which is all pretty consistent with each other in multiple threads from what I’ve seen... in trailers, which I almost always ‘credit’ as the source of my assumptions. Hence why I always cautiously state something and heck in at least 1 post I even say that I could be off and this was before S9 started.
Heck, in one thread I was even speaking with someone who already had a strong opinion on the bow before even playing and was stating things instead of thinking how things could be, just like I have done in my previous post. The difference was I never stated anything but implied things based off of the game I know.
But imagine finding opinions on something on a forum even when spitballing. So I’d say before you assume stuff again to first ask why someone is saying something (before quoting just one post with basically saying what you yourself said before even playing) just to know where someone is getting his details from so you don’t say something as inaccurate as “really shouldn’t be drawing conclusions based purely off of what others say”.
