Forum Discussion
Personally, I would be ok with people on console having aa, as consoles really do have a disadvantage against pc players with fps and worse set-ups usually. Although, I think the best solution would be to simply not allow crossplay and completely disable aa for console players, but then q times would increase so thats not happening.
But that doesn't justify giving aa to players on pc, who willingly use a controller. If you want to play on a controller, an inherently worse input device, then you likely do it only because of the aa. I still can't see why people on pc with controllers have aa.
PC players have significantly reduced aim assist compared to console players (0.4 < 0.6).
- powercorwastaken1 month agoSeasoned Newcomer
No aim assist should exist on pc.
Apex and Cod are the only 2 cancerous games where strong aim assist exists on pc. Look at other games like cs2, valorant, they are pc exclusive and have no pro players with controllers. That proves that MnK is just better without any assisting software. My favourite example is Rainbow 6 siege, it has 0 aim assist with cross-play and only 2 pros who use controller (Hmm wonder why apex has so many pros on controller then).
If a game is supposed to be competitive you can't just add aimbot to 1 input device and call it fair. It goes against all standards of competitions.
It would be the same as giving performance drugs to people running marathons in basketball shoes instead of running shoes.
Featured Places
Apex Legends General Discussion
Discuss the latest news and game information around Apex Legends in the community forums.Latest Activity: 1 hour agoCommunity Highlights
- EA_Mako1 month ago
Community Manager