@neillkorey wrote:
I completely disagree that solos would not cause a problem how can you sit here and argue that 60 separate players would not be worse than 20 separate teams I just cannot understand that you really think this map could handle it but you want solo and you disregard ever single argument against it so keep bringing it up everyday and hopefully they still never add it is all I can say good day to you and keep believing that the game is the problem when it is you
"Disregard" is the wrong word i would use the word destroy. How did i disregard your argument? I answered all your points and clearly explained why you are wrong.
And now i will do so again since you are caught up on this 60 players issue. Its really very simple if you took a second to think about it. Lets say 60 people is too many for solos, it might be i dont know for sure. You seriously cant think of an obvious solution for that?
I mean come on how difficult is it for respawn to set the solo max player count at 50 or 40 or whatever they end up deciding is the right number? Like that is such a pathetically weak argument because the solution is so simple, and quite honestly im shocked that you would make such a big deal out of nothing.
You would really want them to not add in solos due to a "problem" that can be solved so easily which is very sad in my opinion. Just admit the real reason is because you know you wont win any solo matches and therefore dont want anyone else to enjoy a mode you would get crushed in. That i could accept but this nonsense with the 60 players? Please.
Once again i want to point out that you're grasping for straws here. Try to think of something better and ill destroy that too, not disregard but destroy.