128 player just why?

I totally agree. I really don't understand why they didn't take BF3 as an example where the most played maps were infantry focused such as grand bazaar, seine crossing, etc...

2042 maps just feel like they tried to mix Battlefield Conquest mod with a BR.

Plus it creates performance issues to me. 

please show me the posts that asked for it I'm interested in seeing the facts??? 

the performance hit many videos saying that 3080/90s cant even hit 100fps lol that's a hit imho. marketing in bf is crap the EA marketing makes a miss every time lol

I just can't understand them anymore, I started playing in BF3 and loved the game, I went back to BC2 and loved it, even more, BF4 as much, in the beginning, was broken the devs worked hard and fixed the game, I just can't see the light at the end for 2042, it's almost like the devs have no clue what they even wanted out of the game. I mean the statement that was we have every studio working on the game actually shows but sadly it's almost like every studio did things without communication with each other.

@V1kingH4msterMore maps are coming and EA DICE know that the Metro / Lockers style of games are popular… and they are likely to add them to Portal soon.

I have enjoyed the maps so far, but I am also comfortable with vehicles in the game. For the large maps, you really need to hitch a ride where possible.

A HUGE part of this problem is making everyone spawn in together on map start… which is really, really dumb. Although I suppose it more “fair” this way?

I hope they do I loved metro just because I really hate vehicle maps, there is nothing I hate more than just dying because no one seems to want to deal with the tank or helos,

don't get me wrong I get the game is 1 day old but bf3/4 had me in that first hour 2042 is still yet to excite me and I'm 5 hours in, I'm just not enjoying the game like i really should.

i have never wanted to refund a bf game but I must say I'm tempted with 2042. but then I may just try and stick it out maybe I will start to enjoy it more over time.

Surely they will improve the game. It is different from the other BF games. Seems like Dice can’t win. Nothing is good for the community. If they do something new, people say why???If they reskin BF4: why???? Everybody wants different things. I for example can’t stand infantry small maps. I like the tactical aspect of the game. Using vehicles, slowly approaching objectives gives me joy. My enjoyment does not come from the scoreboard either. (I am always in the top half though). I am looking forward to play this game, hope they improve it to the point where everyone can enjoy it.  

Player counts never really makes a game feel full or not. It always depends on the size of the map, spawn points, points of interest. 

I really wish they would have gone with either 64 players or maybe even something like 100. Battlefield has been second to none when it comes to performance while have destruction and high player counts, but 128 is pushing hardware back to the limit. 

I’m having a mixed time, but that’s normal for me. I hate everything at first and I’ve realized it’s just part of my own process haha. It’s still a BF game and I’m starting to enjoy it more and more. 

If they can improve the performance then I’m not sure how I’ll feel in the end. Right now, it kinda feels like they had to give up too much for that trade off.