Forum Discussion

hitmanpr1's avatar
hitmanpr1
4 years ago

32 vs 32 FPS Boost /Experience Overall Thumbs Up

Had 5 Matches and I had fun. Fps stayed on 60 stable 4k. Using a 2070s. Had time to decide and switch flanks position when I saw troops were needed else where. Manage to dominate air for a while Beca...
discussion
Buzzfunk's avatar
Buzzfunk
4 years ago
@hitmanpr1 Same here. Much better and proof that 128 players on paper may read good but it just isnt working in the game.

Now add levolution events, more destruction, A LOT MORE skins and 3-4 custom maps for Rush and TDM and i will stop complaining. 😉
lookcr's avatar
lookcr
Rising Ace
4 years ago
@Buzzfunk and change the map design too, even for 32x32 I'm finding it empty.
  • Buzzfunk's avatar
    Buzzfunk
    4 years ago
    @lookcr Well maybe. But it aint going to happen. Hopefully the new maps will take all the critic seriously. 64 players is just better for FPS and maybe it will allow them to return levolution and such. Im guessing 128 players kills the CPU so any events would kill FPS (strangely the storms dont do that).
    • RayD_O1's avatar
      RayD_O1
      Hero
      4 years ago
      @Buzzfunk Yep 128 players is a CPU killer for most players as the game is not optimised.
      • hitmanpr1's avatar
        hitmanpr1
        4 years ago

        True. At one time the rocket launch on orbital with all the dust and smoke it created the fps stayed on 60 an I was basically next to the rocket.

About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion

Discuss the latest news and game information around Battlefield 2042 in the community forums.16,132 PostsLatest Activity: 20 minutes ago