Active protection against EMKV90-TOR
What is your opinion on whether active protection should deflect EMKV90-TOR projectiles. I vote yes. Active defense should reflect projectiles or greatly reduce damage dealt.
Forum Discussion
The TOR's turret speed is so slow its usually pretty easy to out maneuver it. It's ammo pool is very slow to reload as well.
I would never choose the TOR over the MBT myself.
@Ironhead841 wrote:
EMKV90-TOR imbalance creates 2 problems in the game.
1. This is a passive siege tank that stands on the hill of its respawn and shoots wounded animals with impunity. There is no need to explain anything here, since it will not work to get to it with a tank or arrange a duel, you will be definitely destroyed in 8 cases out of 10.
2. His presence makes attack helicopters unplayable (KA-52 and Apache). Due to the large hitbox and low maneuverability, an attack helicopter will be easy to catch with an EMKV90-TOR shot. And most importantly, when you try to attack the ground, you generally become an easy target for EMKV90-TOR. You say, so you need to destroy it first. In most cases, the EMKV90-TOR is under the cover of anti-aircraft guns. To destroy an anti-aircraft gun with an attack helicopter, you need to make demonic efforts, unlike the NightBird. In most cases, your attack on the EMKV90-TOR position under the cover of anti-aircraft guns is doomed to failure. For this reason, I personally have to take the NightBird in order to help my team in some way and not just drain the helicopter. Although I really want to show off on (KA-52 and Apache).
I think that the damage to the attack helicopter from the EMKV90-TOR should be reduced to the values of G-84 from the Fox
Featured Places
