Forum Discussion
@NazT55 wrote:I too was really excited for Portal when first announced. IMO they probably wanted to do more for Portal but when the game tanked they moved teams around and focused more on the main game to improve it. I really wanted them to bring more BF2 maps to Portal and assets.
Which stunk because I really wanted much more with Portal.
Maybe the next one will retry the portal thing?
@GrizzGolf wrote:
@NazT55 wrote:
I too was really excited for Portal when first announced. IMO they probably wanted to do more for Portal but when the game tanked they moved teams around and focused more on the main game to improve it. I really wanted them to bring more BF2 maps to Portal and assets.
Which stunk because I really wanted much more with Portal.
Maybe the next one will retry the portal thing?
Hopefully. Portal is great but could be even better with further development.
- UP_Hawxxeye7 months agoLegend
The problem with portal is that it is set up to give an inferior experience compared to the matchmaking.
Matchmaking gives you Full progression + PvP A.I to fill for the missing players. Players are 1-2 clicks away from starting a match.
Portal only gives full progression with the A.I disabled so unless you have a community of enough people to start a server, you will not be getting anywhere in portal. Players have to manually find and select your server. Your server is also probably buried under a ton of "1000% damage hArDcOrE L33T" and 4 man kill trading mastery progression servers
- sk1lld7 months agoLegend
Portal could have been great but the progression nerfs kind of killed it.
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 10 hours ago
- 11 hours ago