Forum Discussion
3 years ago
@protoman23 It's really odd from my POV because 128 breakthrough was just nothing but mindless chaos for me. That's really what players want? I felt 64 players better provided a BF experience.
Not to mention, I would have to wait way longer to find a 128 Breakthrough over Conquest.
Not to mention, I would have to wait way longer to find a 128 Breakthrough over Conquest.
3 years ago
@Albake21z I'm sort of in the same boat as you, 128 BT just seemed to be an endless spawn-die loop for me. But a lot of that is map design and also the fact that with vehicles and flying squirrels, it is WAY too easy to outflank any sort of defense unless it's a hedgehog and that takes too much coordination for the average BF2042 team to set up. I used to love playing BF1 and BFV Breakthrough because you actually had to punch through an enemy line to get to an objective. In 2042, you just drop a few Sundances out of a Condor while the objective is getting suppressed by Nightbirds and Boltes, and voila, a few beacons later, your defense is screwed.
That having been said, the folks who do play BT 128 seem VERY passionate about it. I don't want them to lose their favorite mode, it's just not my thing. I'm surprised DICE removed it.
That having been said, the folks who do play BT 128 seem VERY passionate about it. I don't want them to lose their favorite mode, it's just not my thing. I'm surprised DICE removed it.
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Discuss the latest news and game information around Battlefield 2042 in the community forums.15,739 PostsLatest Activity: 3 hours ago
Recent Discussions
Seriously EA?
Solved4 hours ago- 6 hours ago
- 8 hours ago